pull down to refresh
I’m amazed how much you two have to say about this without ever presenting a counter argument.
Counter argument to what? Your flawed framework? Can't explain gravity to someone who thinks the earth is flat.
I believe US elections would not be competitive at all if this bloc of right-leaning non-voters would just fill in the bubbles. Biden never would have won. The corona hysteria would have been cut short by a year. We'd have mass deportations in 2021, skipping all of the Biden caravans. No Ukraine war. Venezuela would already be as nice as California.
Not to mention, the population of these people turns into enemy points when a zone gets captured. So @Undisciplined is probably boosting the population numbers of a communist representative.
No one is saying the system of American democracy or any democracy is legitimate. I believe in 1 vote per Bitcoin. But you don't just wait around. You have to engage in the national dialogue and win legal battles to keep your guys out of jail and in power and defend the American people from communism by any means available.
We have to hit the communists hard while they're down. Double tap these people. Come on.
You have to engage in the national dialogue and win legal battles to keep your guys out of jail and in power and defend the American people from communism by any means available
My disagreement with that is on voting being an actual means for the individual to achieve those things. It's fascinating that you both equate my point about voting being pointless with an unwillingness to do anything. That's an enormous non-sequitur. My objection is because it is not an effective means. I'm all for effective means.
Here's how this argument seems to me:
You: Go do raindances in your yard to fight communism.
Me: I don't understand how that reduces communism.
You: You must love communism.
Here's how this argument seems to me:
You: Go do raindances in your yard to fight communism.
Me: I don't understand how that reduces communism.
You: You must love communism.
Yeah, you must. You have to partake in the dance.
You know we're not talking about voting in general right? We're talking about voting in 2026.
What's different about 2026 that changes this argument?
If all you can offer is a command, I'm going to ignore it.
See this proves my point. If you came to the rain dances you wouldn't ask this question. You would know why this time is different. You would feel it instinctively because you'd be invested in the game. But because you lack whimsy, you're out of the loop. If you fill in the bubbles, then you can savor the entrails of the beast up close and know good from evil.
Since you haven't explained anything to me, I have no reason to regret being out of the loop, nor do I have any reason to change my mind.
The explanation is that if Democrats win they hit us with another wave of caravans and we're all dead. What more explanation do you need?
Your bloc lets them capture zones peacefully, and then we're stuck fighting from outside which is 1,000 times harder.
The same additional explanation I've been asking for the entire time. Explain how my single non-decisive vote prevents that.
I can't make the rest of "my bloc" vote, so you're just talking to me and my one vote in a non-swing district.
My objection is because it is not an effective means. I'm all for effective means.
I know that you're down for step 3. The problem is we have to finish step 1 first. And step 2 depends on the outcome of step 1, and then we still have to get through steps 4, 5, and 6. Step 4 is classified and you're going to disagree on step 5 but you're wrong about that too. So it would be nice if you would just learn to fall in line with the narrative today so that we don't have to go through this debate at every point in the process. This is not a normal election. We're going to end communism.
Notice how mad the left is, how utterly devastated and panicked they are over everything that's happening. My demographic bloc did that. Your bloc should listen to my bloc.
You don't have to go through the debate at every turn if you make a compelling argument now. If you won't, then expect more arguments.
I'd also caution you to not be so sure about what I will and won't disagree with.
Why "because of Darth"?
I hope not.
raindance to demoralize communists when they add up all the crackheads they need to canvas
Biden didn't win, that's the point. We got the graphs and data to prove it, even with non-voters sidelined the steal had to so obvious that it was in the public narrative. It took a whole ass fake pandemic and mail-in ballot operation to do it.
The energy in 16 necessitated an escalation in 20, that ammo was spent and couldn't sustain. It's simple force multiplication.
Imagine the fun going on behind the scenes in all this.
They're running out of communists and crackheads, but seems they can always count on sidelining more objectors.
There's a scene in Saving Private Ryan where they're moving through a bombed out town and a German propaganda voice comes out over a microphone and says "The Statue of Liberty is kaput"
Few pick up on that highlight of psychological warfare. I think most people would recognize the term demoralization tactic. That's referred to often with "suppression polls", using fake polls to suggest Republicans can't win and keep people home.
I read or heard something once about how they could tell a mans politics when Germans blasted propaganda by their reactions. Those tactics didn't have to work on everyone, just enough to swing things a smidge.
I think there's a more accurate term in psyop parlance that relates to non-voters though: "Subjective Incompetence"
Explains non-voters to the letter.