pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 11h \ parent \ on: SN release: evergreenness ranking, search refinements, jobs catchup meta

Did anything change with how zappers are rewarded?

write
preview
77 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 5h

Nope. I'm open to ideas but I probably won't wrench on rewards until I'm ready to give each territory its own rewards pool.

reply
122 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 4h

Maybe replace zapping top posts early with some measure of how much more Lit your zaps made posts.

reply
150 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 4h

zapping lit posts early rather than new/top posts early makes sense.

other realities to consider:

  1. we still use trust in rewards. removing it would be cool (but it's complicated).
  2. we want each territory to have its own pool (or no pool)
reply
122 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 4h

I'm thinking that since Lit has a decay function built in, the early part isn't as important.

Generally, zapping something early will correspond to moving it up more Lit ranks. This also gets more directly at the reason early zapping was rewarded, which was making good content more visible.

What you'd probably need to track is the highest Lit rank an item achieved for the day and reward people for their contributions towards moving items towards the top.

reply
70 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 4h

That makes sense, we'd measure daily lit deltas.

reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 4h

I want daily lit deltas added to our personal statistics.

reply
57 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 4h

If it shows, it grows.

reply