reply on: SN release: evergreenness ranking, search refinements, jobs catchup \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

48 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b OP 15h \ parent \ on: SN release: evergreenness ranking, search refinements, jobs catchup meta

It’s a power unique to sats I think.

@simplestacker came up with the simple form that made it worth doing.

1 sat \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 11h

Did anything change with how zappers are rewarded?

77 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 5h

Nope. I'm open to ideas but I probably won't wrench on rewards until I'm ready to give each territory its own rewards pool.

122 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 4h

Maybe replace zapping top posts early with some measure of how much more Lit your zaps made posts.

150 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 4h

zapping lit posts early rather than new/top posts early makes sense.

other realities to consider:

we still use trust in rewards. removing it would be cool (but it's complicated).
we want each territory to have its own pool (or no pool)

122 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 4h

I'm thinking that since Lit has a decay function built in, the early part isn't as important.

Generally, zapping something early will correspond to moving it up more Lit ranks. This also gets more directly at the reason early zapping was rewarded, which was making good content more visible.

What you'd probably need to track is the highest Lit rank an item achieved for the day and reward people for their contributions towards moving items towards the top.