This is one of the new Claude 5 things. It fuzzes very often. Yesterday I asked it to review a migration I'm doing on a low-level encoding library, and it created a little fuzzing harness for both versions to see what it did differently. Pretty cool.
According to Claude, this is a result of me having a little phrase in my "review this wip" template that lists leave no stone unturned as an acceptance criterium. Which I actually like that it is interpreted that way.
This is one of the new Claude 5 things. It fuzzes very often. Yesterday I asked it to review a migration I'm doing on a low-level encoding library, and it created a little fuzzing harness for both versions to see what it did differently. Pretty cool.
According to Claude, this is a result of me having a little phrase in my "review this wip" template that lists
leave no stone unturnedas an acceptance criterium. Which I actually like that it is interpreted that way.