pull down to refresh
"Selection accuracy". Just compare against the other #5/#6 (me):
I'm rank 6 where @denlillaapan is rank 5 (comments), and I am rank 5 where he is rank 6 (posts.)
Today is have your arrangement (#5 post, #6 comment) and received 3.5% — half of what is had in the screenshot above.
I understand nothing.
lol, that's insane. Honestly quite incredible there's such a big difference
I didn't study the new algo but I think it has something to do with consistency. So if you only upzap those things that a lot of other stackers upzapped, and early, then you get a larger share. In your case you consistently upzapped very popular comments. Which is why there is nearly a 3x cliff between us on the comments because I don't discriminate upzaps on comments much.
I spent around 11k or so
I thought trust factored into the rank but rank determined the rewards. It must be more different than I realized.
Insane that you spent that much.
Don't think I ever hit 7% in the rewards pool. my god.
Imagine if I'd done that on the massive pots of 3 million sats back in... checks notes... a few weeks ago!
update: manually counting about 2,500 CCs spent yesterday (is there a way to quickly tally up/calculate that?), so perhaps not that great of a return?