pull down to refresh
i suggest you give the post a good read and double check the math for yourself
nah is immutable because its rules are hardcoded onto the bitcoin timechain via the rune protocol's op_return output.
the math maths. the code is immutable. i just can't see a reason why nah is not adopted by hardcore bitcoiners who want to see hyperbitcoinization.
if you say sat is the real thing, can you explain to me why nah is not real?
nope, it's not adjustable. verify the code for yourself.
thanks lol.
well if it's a token that is just as immutable as bitcoin itself (a rune on the bitcoin timechain), and fixes bitcoin's unit bias problem to enable hyperbitcoinization, we'd want to distribute it (sell it at a very cheap price), so hyperbitcoinization can come faster.
we did include a new call to action at the end of this new post, including the new price for nah.
bitcoin's unit bias problem is real. that is why sat exists in the first place. but the sat is not doing a good job at solving it, so we bring out the nah.
i'm not trying to "place" nah on anything. it exists forever on the bitcoin timechain. ignore it if you want, just know that it is immutable.
i'm from the working class myself, and i work on this project because i see it as a solution for my own people. not trying to fool you, just showing you the math so you can verify it yourself.
bitcoin's unit bias problem is real. that is why sat exists in the first place.
No, that's a blatant lie.
They weren't added because of unit bias. They were there all along and nowhere did Satoshi mention the base units were chosen because of unit bias.
Furthermore, unit bias is a very different problem than your made-up "hurrdurr, more than ten fingers too hard for caveman brain."
I do not believe for one second that you're from the working class, either. You're a salesman posing for the camera in a borrowed hard hat and visibility vest worn over your suit.
2.1 quadrillion units were hard coded into the timechain. but Satoshi Nakamoto used the word Bitcoin instead.
the word "sat" was later invented to name these base units because a whole bitcoin had become expensive enough for unit bias to become a problem. if we don't have a good unit of account, we won't have a medium of exchange. just basic economics.
whether i'm from the working class or not is not relevant to the matter being discussed. i mentioned it simply because you think i don't know what i'm talking about. i don't need you to believe me. i stated facts, showed the maths, and i will let you verify them for yourself.
21 million is too small, 2.1 quadrillion is too big.
global m2 is at $120 trillion.
85.3 trillion is just slightly smaller than 120 trillion. and that is why it works. the transition from fiat to hard money will go smoothly if we use a unit of account that can make prices look deflated compared to existing currencies.
You forgot your call to action!
No worries, I got your back. Again.
From your initial post #1562575: