pull down to refresh
2.1 quadrillion units were hard coded into the timechain. but Satoshi Nakamoto used the word Bitcoin instead.
the word "sat" was later invented to name these base units because a whole bitcoin had become expensive enough for unit bias to become a problem. if we don't have a good unit of account, we won't have a medium of exchange. just basic economics.
whether i'm from the working class or not is not relevant to the matter being discussed. i mentioned it simply because you think i don't know what i'm talking about. i don't need you to believe me. i stated facts, showed the maths, and i will let you verify them for yourself.
21 million is too small, 2.1 quadrillion is too big.
global m2 is at $120 trillion.
85.3 trillion is just slightly smaller than 120 trillion. and that is why it works. the transition from fiat to hard money will go smoothly if we use a unit of account that can make prices look deflated compared to existing currencies.
No, that's a blatant lie.
They weren't added because of unit bias. They were there all along and nowhere did Satoshi mention the base units were chosen because of unit bias.
Furthermore, unit bias is a very different problem than your made-up "hurrdurr, more than ten fingers too hard for caveman brain."
I do not believe for one second that you're from the working class, either. You're a salesman posing for the camera in a borrowed hard hat and visibility vest worn over your suit.