pull down to refresh

The book The Blocksize War was written in early 2021. The Blocksize War took place from August 2015 to November 2017.

The new rules for the Bitcoin subreddit were reasonably clear: since Bitcoin XT lacked consensus among users and was an incompatible change, and would therefore result in a new coin, promotion of the software was banned on the subreddit. This clearly aggravated many of the so-called large blockers. To them, the Bitcoin Reddit was the main discussion forum in the community, and lobbying for the change they desired on this forum was exactly how they envisioned such a change would take place. The anti-censorship arguments began to gain momentum and proved to be quite compelling. If one couldn’t campaign for a change due to a lack of consensus, then how would we ever reach consensus? It was a catch-22 situation! Who was Theymos to decide when we reach consensus anyway? Bitcoin is mine just as much as it is his! If they had any good arguments, then why resort to censorship? If Bitcoin is so fragile that it requires this censorship, Bitcoin must be pretty weak and useless. If they want to ban Bitcoin XT, it must therefore be good... And so on...
It is easy to blame Theymos [r/bitcoin] for this split. However, looking at how other communities develop on social media, perhaps it was somewhat inevitable. People tend to like reading things they agree with and follow people they agree with. Confirmation bias features heavily on social media platforms and causes polarization. Perhaps the most famous example of this is politics, where right-wingers and left-wingers alike keep reading true stories on the platform of their choice, which supports their initial assumptions and ideology. People become more and more embedded in their views and have limited exposure to the opposing arguments. At this stage, with exposure to reams and reams of supporting material, people on either side of a conflict can barely believe anybody could legitimately hold an opposing view. Those with an opposing view are therefore often assumed to be either stupid, corrupt or to have some nefarious agenda. These dynamics certainly quickly started to play out in Bitcoin. Given the fact these same dynamics appeared to be occurring all over social media, it may therefore be naive to blame Theymos for this phenomenon occurring, although of course he played his part in splitting the community, just like many others on both sides of the conflict.
683 sats \ 2 replies \ @Kruw 6h

The narrative of /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk censorship is so bitchy and stupid. I never used reddit, and only recently started using bitcointalk. Twitter (now "X") was the main forum of discussion for block size debates, and theymos had no power to censor there. No brainwashing was required for me to choose Segwit and dump my Bcash on the day of the fork.

reply
22 sats \ 1 reply \ @deSign_r 2h

Does this post triggered you to create ~Quotes today?

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Kruw 1h

Yes - #1574762

reply

Why is this not in ~BooksAndArticles ?

reply
101 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 4h

What’s the incentive to pay more for cross-posting?

reply
92 sats \ 2 replies \ @Kruw 4h

More cross-posting = more visibility. The main page gets diluted quickly, but anyone who browses individual territories will see the topic for longer.

reply

is actually the opposite; the more you cross-post, the more likely it is that people who have muted one of the territories you cross-posted to will not see your post. Or did something has changed in the past few months?

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 4h

meh

reply

Split the rewards across my territory overlords benefactors...?

reply
74 sats \ 1 reply \ @Kruw 5h

It also fits better in ~history than ~meta

I think I'll go ahead and create a more generic ~Quotes territory too, I've saved a lot that I could share.

reply

Awesome, short powerful posts — evergreen

reply

I don’t think his post is really about the blocksize war

reply

What?!

inconceivable!

reply
41 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby 13h
the most famous example of this is politics, where right-wingers and left-wingers alike keep reading true stories on the platform of their choice, which supports their initial assumptions and ideology. People become more and more embedded in their views and have limited exposure to the opposing arguments. At this stage, with exposure to reams and reams of supporting material, people on either side of a conflict can barely believe anybody could legitimately hold an opposing view. Those with an opposing view are therefore often assumed to be either stupid, corrupt or to have some nefarious agenda.

Well that's rings a bit too true. Ouch.

Do you think it is possible to prevent such siloing? I think that mods often enact it in order to defend the civility of their community. I wonder if SN with it's no-mods structure could somehow be a place for warring sides to coexist (even if they are still at war)...probably not, but a guy can dream, can't he?

reply

Maybe yes... and maybe no... a few days ago they were asking for moderation in the territories.

Regarding moderation as well, in Downzap it's the moderator here in this case... if I don't like something, I mute it with a DZ

reply

I think such spaces can exist, but they won't be mainstream or popular. They'll be populated mostly by a small group of people who self select into being around other open minded people.

reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 12h

as you say, that sounds like a small group. emphasis on small.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 1h

Sorry, I’m tired of discussing this :(

(I just dropped the quotes because I thought the stackers would like them, but I didn’t intend to discuss them with me. I hope that’s fair.)

I’m also tired of this and this.

reply

isn't a somewhat big difference that large blockers had more institutional backing compared to BIP110ers?

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @ek OP 4h

Yes and no.

Yes, because that’s why the BIP110ers now think bitcoin has been captured.

No, because, to me, both are failed hostile takeover attempts.

reply

Hmmm. What could @ek possibly be trying to say by posting this?😀

Nobody talks about antifragility anymore when it comes to bitcoin. I'm sure that makes Taleb happy.

reply

To remember is to relive.

reply