pull down to refresh
Sounds to me you are just not well informed about ~lightning (otherwise you'd know who ethan, humpus are) and building a thesis and accusations on a tweet is kind of absurd.
I valued you as a member of SN, a knowledgeable bitcoiner. Everyone has limits, and we cannot knwo everything, nor we can't always be right. That's why within a community we are all stronger, together. You know about ~Coinjoins, keep your mind open to learn more about what you don't know, because believe me, what we don't know is largely much more than what we know.
I know "Evan" and "Hampus" are maintainers of Lightning wallets, but that doesn't have anything to do with Justin's scamming, does it?
Optimism question just proved the point I explained to you above. Your accusation and post would have much more weight if you were knowledgeable about ~lightning. You are not, and that's why you need to compensate with boots your words.
Everyone has limits, and we cannot know everything, nor we can't always be right.
If I'm not right, then explain how I'm wrong. If you want to dispute the facts I've presented, stop being ambiguous about mistakes you claim I've made. I am willing to answer your questions and make corrections if I'm wrong.
There's nothing to dispute, nor do I want to argue with you. I'm just trying to explain you are not putting yourself in good light, nor are you acknowledging all the work you did building up ~Coinjoin and Wasabi.
Throwing shit on others does not make you look shinier. And if people get scammed, let them be; is not your problem, and that's what they deserve. We all learn by making mistakes.
I'm just trying to explain you are not putting yourself in good light
I disagree. Warning Bitcoiners about their funds being drained by scammers puts myself in a good light, actually.
Starting to sound like this kruw:
I don't understand why this issue got to you, but I wish you had kept it about the lightning rather than made it about calling people names.
I don't see any of the additional conditions you just posted here in your post, so I guess that that's not going to do any good. These conditions are not in your "warning". Yet you keep boosting it. It's fine Kruw... you obviously don't care about anything. So why should I care about you? Better to just counter your bullshit when I can.
I would have upzapped your post if we were going to have a discussion about what the tradeoffs really are. But there is no such discussion. It's all just ad hominem bullshit based on a false, non-connecting argument and cherry-picking half a sentence in a tweet.
Perhaps one day I will understand why this is so important to you that you're massively burning your reputation over it. Until then, I'm just going to continue to be baffled by the cognitive decline.
Feel free to specify any corrections I should make to my scam warning.