pull down to refresh
So ethan, humpus are scammers? That's what you're saying?
Idk who ethan, humpus are. I would rather not change the subject though, we are making progress.
We're not making progress at all because you're still doubling down, still boosting your own comments, still either not being honest or having some major brain damage.
Feel free to specify any corrections I should make to my scam warning.
Sounds to me you are just not well informed about ~lightning (otherwise you'd know who ethan, humpus are) and building a thesis and accusations on a tweet is kind of absurd.
I valued you as a member of SN, a knowledgeable bitcoiner. Everyone has limits, and we cannot knwo everything, nor we can't always be right. That's why within a community we are all stronger, together. You know about ~Coinjoins, keep your mind open to learn more about what you don't know, because believe me, what we don't know is largely much more than what we know.
I know "Evan" and "Hampus" are maintainers of Lightning wallets, but that doesn't have anything to do with Justin's scamming, does it?
Optimism question just proved the point I explained to you above. Your accusation and post would have much more weight if you were knowledgeable about ~lightning. You are not, and that's why you need to compensate with boots your words.
Everyone has limits, and we cannot know everything, nor we can't always be right.
If I'm not right, then explain how I'm wrong. If you want to dispute the facts I've presented, stop being ambiguous about mistakes you claim I've made. I am willing to answer your questions and make corrections if I'm wrong.
I don't see any of the additional conditions you just posted here in your post, so I guess that that's not going to do any good. These conditions are not in your "warning". Yet you keep boosting it. It's fine Kruw... you obviously don't care about anything. So why should I care about you? Better to just counter your bullshit when I can.
I would have upzapped your post if we were going to have a discussion about what the tradeoffs really are. But there is no such discussion. It's all just ad hominem bullshit based on a false, non-connecting argument and cherry-picking half a sentence in a tweet.
Perhaps one day I will understand why this is so important to you that you're massively burning your reputation over it. Until then, I'm just going to continue to be baffled by the cognitive decline.
What other possible conclusion could you draw from these premises? If someone is deliberately trying to get Bitcoiners to expose their funds to theft, it's obvious they are a scammer.