pull down to refresh
The community has tried UI abstractions for 15 years, and they have all failed. Most people only know two things: Bitcoin and Sat. Relying on wallet developers to display mBTC, bits, or kSat creates fragmented standards dependent on localized software.
Money is fundamentally a psychological technology. Understanding Bitcoin is already complex for the masses, and forcing them to memorize scientific prefixes creates immediate cognitive friction. If Bitcoin is to be the global reserve currency, its unit of account must be universally simple, memorable, and globally standardized.
What Nah provides that a UI layer cannot is a finalized, unified global standard to simplify the transition from fiat to hard money. Fiat itself is a psychological problem—a chaotic world of fragmented, unstable units of account. If our alternative relies on fragmented, localized, and hard-to-pronounce UI workarounds, mass adoption will stall. We require a consensus asset that removes all psychological friction on the road to hard money, and that asset is Nah.
Linguistically, this is a natural evolution. The protocol was given to us by Satoshi Nakamoto. If we have the Sat, it is only logical to have the Nah. Based directly on the creator's name, Sat & Nah is a simple, memorable, and natively human nomenclature.
This establishes a dual-asset standard of absolute scarcity on the timechain, much like the historical relationship between silver and gold. Nah serves as the primary cognitive unit of account for daily pricing, while Sat acts as the underlying reserve used to pay miners to send Nah. Ultimately, Sat & Nah represents the cleanest, most definitive solution to the fiat problem.
And this is the key distinction: a denomination is not the same thing as a monetary network.
Creating NAH doesn't make Bitcoin more scarce, more decentralized, or more usable. It creates another thing people must understand, acquire, secure, price, and trust.
Bitcoin's unit bias problem—if you believe it is a problem—is a UX problem. Turning a UX problem into a new consensus asset seems like using a sledgehammer to fix a font-size issue.
I’d rather improve Bitcoin’s interfaces than manufacture another asset on top of Bitcoin and then tell people they need it for hyperbitcoinization.
you sure nah doesn't make the bitcoin timechain more usable? money has 3 main functions: store of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account. without a good unit of account, there is no medium of exchange, and the bitcoin timechain will just be a store of value, failing to become the peer to peer electronic cash system Satoshi Nakamoto intended it to be.
less than 10% of world population understand or own any sat. simply because people cannot use it as a unit of account or medium of exchange. for the 90% to understand bitcoin, you need a unit of account that they can easily count and use. you talk about acquiring and securing as if the 90% out there are going to trust hardware wallets like coldcard and trezor after all the recent incidents. price? btc been stuck in the $60k - $90k range for a few years now. you can forget the $1 million target if we don't have a solution for the unit bias problem.
if bitcoin is a book that teaches people the concept of hard money, sat is a font too small to read. you need a better font. it's still the same book (nah is built on the bitcoin timechain itself, inherits all hashrate and decentralization), but with a different font (change circulating supply from 2 quadrillion to 85.3 trillion).
the main reason Satoshi Nakamoto created bitcoin was because fiat is a bunch of unstable units of account. if we cannot convince people that we have a better unit of account, we are gonna be stuck in the fiat matrix. the unit bias problem is real (see the quote at the beginning of my OP). improving bitcoin's interfaces? you think after all these years there is still room to improve? what could have been tried are already tried. mbtc, ksat... have all failed.
you can continue to try to improve the interfaces and get stuck, or you can adopt the real solution. Sat & Nah is the dual asset standard we need for the bitcoin timechain to win.
People that can't/won't understand Bitcoin as it currently is, do not deserve to own any. The goal is not to persuade 100% of the population. The goal is to recruit 20% and defend against the rest.
The unit bias problem solves itself. Dumb people end up with less money.
People that can't/won't understand Bitcoin as it currently is, do not deserve to own any. The goal is not to persuade 100% of the population. The goal is to recruit 20% and defend against the rest.
The unit bias problem solves itself. Dumb people end up with less money.
Claiming "dumb people end up with less money" mirrors the exact elitist arrogance of central bankers.
If you intentionally leave 80% of the population trapped in fiat, you leave 80% of global human energy fueling inflation, war, and systemic entropy. To permanently defeat the legacy machine, you must drain its liquidity entirely.
More importantly, your exclusionary mindset completely ignores the next generation. Hard money was designed to protect the working class and children in impoverished regions, not just the privileged few who have the time to study Austrian economics. A child in a developing nation should not be penalized because they cannot conceptualize a 233-Sat savings goal for a basic necessity.
Furthermore, this biological reality applies directly to your own children. The 20% elite you wish to recruit will still raise toddlers who count on ten fingers. You cannot teach a 3-year-old the concept of delayed gratification when a daily chore yields 10 Sat and the reward costs hundreds. Without a deflationary, easily countable cognitive standard like Nah, even your own descendants will default back to the comfort of fiat.
Defending the network does not mean keeping the masses out; it means building the architecture to bring them in. Sat & Nah provides the cognitive bridge to onboard the remaining 80%, protect the next generation, and complete the transition to a global dual-asset standard.
A child in a developing nation should not be penalized because they cannot conceptualize a 233-Sat savings goal for a basic necessity.
Money isn't for children. You're not understanding what money is.
The complexity of chemical equations isn't intentionally excluding anyone from the field; the expressions and jargon work perfectly fine for the people using them. Trying to make chemistry accessible for the masses does nothing for developing new medicines or improving food quality.
You have to teach children to count past 100 if your hope is for them to make money someday. It's not on me to choose a different currency.
Money isn't for children. You're not understanding what money is.
The complexity of chemical equations isn't intentionally excluding anyone from the field; the expressions and jargon work perfectly fine for the people using them. Trying to make chemistry accessible for the masses does nothing for developing new medicines or improving food quality.
You have to teach children to count past 100 if your hope is for them to make money someday. It's not on me to choose a different currency.
Your chemistry analogy is fundamentally flawed. Chemistry is a specialized discipline for professionals, whereas money is the universal incentive system for all human cooperation. If a monetary network is only legible to a specialized elite, it is not a global reserve currency. It is simply a recreation of the fiat central banking system.
Saying "money isn't for children" proves you misunderstand the core function of behavioral psychology. The objective is not for a toddler to execute transactions, sign contracts, or understand macroeconomics. The objective is to hardwire low time preference during their most critical developmental window.
By the time a child's brain naturally develops the capacity to conceptually count past 100, their foundational psychological habits are already set. If you wait until they are older to teach capital accumulation, you have already surrendered their cognitive development to high time preference.
No one is abandoning the timechain or choosing a different base currency. We are establishing Nah to bridge the cognitive gap that Sat mathematically cannot close. Sat & Nah provides a unified standard that scales for the cryptographic engineer, the global merchant, and the 3-year-old learning to delay gratification.
Chemistry is a specialized discipline for professionals, whereas money is the universal incentive system for all human cooperation. If a monetary network is only legible to a specialized elite, it is not a global reserve currency. It is simply a recreation of the fiat central banking system.
Money, perhaps in a sense. Finance, no. The realm of >1 BTC transactions is the exclusive domain of specialized elites.
The problem with the fiat central banking system is not that a few individuals are making decisions that impact large masses of people. The problem is that those decisions revolve around political coercion rather than market demand. The solution, which has already been achieved, is to set a hard cap on supply that is enforced through a neutral, decentralized incentive structure. Unit bias is a psychological quirk that does not hinder adoption as global reserve currency, because that level of adoption is driven by need for a currency that doesn't skim from the users.
Income and expenses being assumed equal, it is impossible for a fiat saver to compete with a Bitcoin saver in terms of accumulating purchasing power, because the fiat saver is continuously bleeding value by design. A cognitive bias in favor of fiat, whether it's unit bias or herd mentality or any other psychological proclivity, cannot overcome the underlying math of the game being played.
Sat & Nah provides a unified standard that scales for the cryptographic engineer, the global merchant, and the 3-year-old learning to delay gratification.
You don't need a token for any of this. If they're a toddler then use raffle tickets. If they're an adult then use sats.
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
Your solution isn't a global standard, it's a shitcoin with a pet name
last time i took a look, this platform is named SN.
Sat & Nah.
you probably need to sit down and meditate on this a lil bit.
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
reply
18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
reply
reply
18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW318 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
reply
reply
18 sats \ 0 replies \ https://stacker.news/Solomonsatoshi
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155170
https://m.stacker.news/155727
https://m.stacker.news/155168
The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3
https://m.stacker.news/155168
https://m.stacker.news/155169
https://m.stacker.news/155170
reply
2 million downzaps
ha! it's destined to become the biggest post on SN.
and counting
If the actual problem is unit bias and human cognition, why does the solution need to be a new asset at all?
We already have sats. Wallets, merchants, and interfaces can display 1,000 sats as “1k sats,” or even abstract the denomination entirely for the user.
What exactly does NAH provide that a denomination/UI layer on top of sats cannot provide—and why is creating a new consensus asset necessary to solve a psychological problem?
Also read:
#808258
#796090
#1264166
#226707
#32990
#814636
#385035