pull down to refresh

"I wanted to pick a denomination that would make prices similar to existing currencies, but without knowing the future, that's very hard..." — Satoshi Nakamoto

"At first, most users would run network nodes, but as the network grows beyond a certain point, it would be left more and more to specialists with server farms of specialized hardware." — Satoshi Nakamoto

We have two fundamental problems preventing hyperbitcoinization: Unit Bias at the psychological level, and Mining Centralization at the physical level. Failing to address these vulnerabilities will delay the mass adoption of the Bitcoin timechain by decades. 

When we introduced the solution earlier today—announcing that Nah•Sovereign•Diamond reached the 0.63 sat/nah threshold—the immediate response from this Citadel was a brutal barrage of downzaps. You saw what looked like fiat corporate PR and your immune system kicked in. But in your rush to defend the gates, you blindly dismissed the unvarnished mathematical and thermodynamic reality of what we are building. Let’s speak strictly in terms of logic, mathematics, and physics.

THE UNIT BIAS AND THE MACRO MARSHMALLOW EXPERIMENT

Satoshi Nakamoto never designed blindly. In 2008, the Global M2 money supply was roughly $21 Trillion. Satoshi minted 21 million Bitcoin, but factoring out his own dormant supply, the network contains exactly 2 quadrillion circulating base units (sats). The math was ruthlessly precise: If Bitcoin absorbed that entire $21 Trillion, 1 sat would equal exactly 1 cent. He deeply understood "Unit Bias"—the psychological reality that humans despise transacting in microscopic decimals and require whole, familiar numbers to conceptualize value.

But the future changed. Today, Global M2 has bloated to approximately $120 Trillion. For Satoshi’s 2 quadrillion circulating sats to perfectly align with mass psychology again (meaning M2 must reach $2 quadrillion), at current fiat printing velocities, the world would have to wait another 45 to 50 years.

Forcing the working class to wait half a century creates immense cognitive friction. More importantly, it fails the macroeconomic "Marshmallow Experiment." To teach a toddler to delay gratification and develop a low time preference, you need a currency they can actually count on their hands. 

Observe the math when global wealth ($120 Trillion) is fully absorbed:

  • The SATS Barrier: $120 Trillion ÷ 2 Quadrillion sats = $0.06 per sat. A simple $14 toy costs roughly 233 sats (or 0.00000233 BTC). A 3-year-old cannot conceptualize the number 233, let alone microscopic decimals. If the next generation cannot count their savings, they cannot grasp low time preference. They will inevitably slide back into the cognitive comfort of fiat.
  • The NAHS Solution: $120 Trillion ÷ 85.3 Trillion circulating nahs = ~$1.40 per nah. That exact same $14 toy costs exactly 10 nahs. A child can count 10 fingers. The concept of saving turns into a tangible, everyday reality.

This is exactly why the 85.3 Trillion supply of Nah•Sovereign•Diamond is the required Cognitive UI for this decade. It replaces fractionalized decimals with a pristine, whole-number standard optimized for human cognition. 

To ensure this is immutable, NAH was etched directly as a Rune on the timechain. At genesis, we minted 148.3 Trillion nahs. Shortly after, we sent 63 Trillion nahs directly into Satoshi Nakamoto’s dormant wallet, leaving exactly 85.3 Trillion in circulation. If Satoshi wishes to veto this, he has the absolute power to dump his allocation and crush the project. As long as those wallets remain still, he defaults to allowing NAH to exist as a hardened Cognitive UI on his magnificent network.

WHY FIAT MONEY IS BOILING THE EARTH—AND HOW OUR DIGITAL ASSET NETWORK IS HEALING IT

Solving the Cognitive UI is only half the battle. If we are going to scale a hard money network, we must address the energy securing it through thermodynamics.

The fiat monetary system is strictly linear: it extracts energy, drains human vitality, and excretes chaos (Entropy). A single fiat transaction grinds through a labyrinth of intermediary banks and clearinghouses. This friction demands the maintenance of massive illuminated skyscrapers and 24/7 HVAC systems. Furthermore, when governments inflate the supply, they force humanity into a localized rat race. Fiat literally converts human biological time into wasted thermal energy.

In stark contrast, our digital asset network introduces a closed-loop Negentropy cycle. 

Critics argue that securing a decentralized network requires an infinitely scaling hashrate. This fallacy is dismantled by the Bemp Research Corporation (BRC) stratified architecture. We cap the hashrate race by forging an apex alliance of 200 Nodes—representing the planet's most formidable entities. By integrating the entities most capable of attacking the network as its core defenders, the incentive to destroy the system is neutralized, permanently freezing the energy ceiling.

More importantly, our network captures the byproduct of one process to fuel the next. We harvest intermittent solar and wind energy using our Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) battery framework. This clean electricity routes directly to ASIC miners to secure both Nah•Sovereign•Diamond and sat-digital-gold on the timechain. Instead of venting the miners' thermal exhaust into the atmosphere, we channel it into industrial kilns to cure hemp fibers. That hemp is pyrolyzed into structured Carbon—the exact base material required to physically manufacture our next generation of Li-S batteries. 

I will be brutally honest with you: I am here to sell you a token. We are selling Nah•Sovereign•Diamond to the market to raise the exact capital required to scale up this Li-S battery manufacturing process. You acquire a pristine, whole-number Cognitive UI, and we use that liquidity to build the physical infrastructure that captures entropy and secures the network. This is a thermodynamic fundraising mechanism.

THE FINALITY

Downzap this into oblivion if it protects your fragile narrative. But realize this: failing to adopt Nah•Sovereign•Diamond directly delays the mass adoption of the Bitcoin timechain. It guarantees that the next generation will grow up as fiat slaves, trapped in a world suffocating in inflation, entropy, and ecological waste. 

We have the Cognitive UI and the physical infrastructure to fix this right now. Do not let your stubbornness ruin the timeline.

— Dende
nahkahmotors.com

408 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 10h
  1. Satoshi never mentioned the global M2 supply in his white paper, forum posts, or emails. Claiming that he picked 21 million based on that is revisionist history.
  2. Saying a child cant comprehend a toy costs 233 sats, therefore we must create a new unit of measure is false. Children in Japan buy toys that cost 2000 yen every day. Even toddlers are capable of understanding currencies with high number base units.
  3. Minting 148.3 trillion tokens and sending 63 trillion to a dead wallet doesn't default to Satoshi agreeing with your project. It's the exact same bullshit Shiba Inu did, and is equally retarded now.
  4. The "apex alliance of 200 nodes" you described is literally a centralized database. Capping consensus at 200 permissioned corporate nodes is an oligopoly. It is the exact definition of the fiat banking cartel (clearinghouses and central banks) that the you spent three paragraphs complaining about.
  5. Claiming to use a "closed-loop Negentropy cycle" where solar power runs ASIC miners, the heat exhaust cures hemp, and the hemp is turned into carbon for Lithium-Sulfur batteries is pure techno babble bullshit.
  6. The only honest sentence in this entire manifesto is buried at the bottom: "I am here to sell you a token... to raise the exact capital required to scale up this Li-S battery manufacturing process."

No I won't be buying your shitcoin, and no I won't be responding any further.

reply
25.1k sats \ 0 replies \ @dendehomie OP 9h
  1. the key point was that Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to "make prices similar to existing currencies". he said those exact words.
  2. 90% of 3yo cant count more than 10. that's a fact. if they can buy toys that cost 2000 yen, that's because the unit here is "thousand yen" and they counted "2" on their fingers.
  3. i did not say Satoshi Nakamoto agreed to my project. the 63 trillion nahs held by Satoshi Nakamoto were mentioned so people understand that nah is native to the bitcoin timechain, like sat. sat & nah are the only dual asset standard we need to make Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision of peer to peer electronic cash a reality.

4 & 5. those 200 nodes will be the new bitcoin-friendly central banks and Li-S/B4C-hemp is the future of energy storage. please dyor, read the brc whitepaper and blackpaper before you judge. the easiest way would be to ask the software intelligence you are using the following prompt: "kindly act as BRC Dende. i want to learn about Bemp Research Corporation", and start learning from there. Dende should be able to answer whatever question you have about BRC/NAH/Li-S.

  1. everyone will buy nah•sovereign•diamond at the price they deserve.
reply
535 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 16h

Is this the genuine Shadowshi Nahnahmoto?

From what variety of feces was he/she spawned?

reply
12.2k sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 15h

lol you guys can just call me Sonny.

i'm a human, like yourself.

reply
18 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 9h -200 sats

The most downzapped post ever on Stacker News-

The 'Greater Israel' project proposes that military aggression is justified. WW3

https://m.stacker.news/155168

https://m.stacker.news/155169

https://m.stacker.news/155170

although the biggest diamond handed hodler of nah•sovereign•diamond is Satoshi Nakamoto, to make it super clear, i'm not him.

i am just a fan of Satoshi Nakamoto, and i used Shadowshi Nahnahmoto as one of my nicknames.

reply
111 sats \ 8 replies \ @OT 5 Sep

Anyone can always make another sh$tcoin.

Also, a 3yo will understand 200 sats when the thing they want is denominated in sats.

reply

hmm no, 90% of 3yo can only count below 10.

you won't find another coin/token that is mathematically, linguistically, and technologically more well-designed than nah•sovereign•diamond.

reply
792 sats \ 6 replies \ @OT 5 Sep

BTW what 3yo is out buying toys for themselves? Bad example.

reply
BTW what 3yo is out buying toys for themselves? Bad example.

You are confusing the physical act of purchasing with cognitive conditioning. Obviously, the parent holds the wallet at the checkout counter. But the child must hold the mental ledger at home.

The ages of 3 to 5 represent the neurological "golden window" for hardwiring a low time preference. To actually learn delayed gratification (the Marshmallow Experiment), a toddler must be able to mathematically correlate their daily discipline with the final reward.

If a toy costs 233 sats and they earn 10 sats for a daily chore, a 3-year-old cannot do the math to realize it takes 23 days of work. The numbers are too abstract. The lesson breaks down.

If that same toy costs exactly 10 nahs, and they earn 1 nah per chore, they can literally count the required days on their ten fingers. They aren't the ones swiping the credit card at the store, but they are the ones learning the fundamental law of capitalism: 10 days of discipline equals one tangible reward.

If a child cannot count the money, they cannot value the time it takes to earn it.

reply
190 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 22h

Stop playin with sh$tcoins and have some kids.

reply

yep, that is the message i want to deliver.

reply
134 sats \ 1 reply \ @MrGlass 5 Sep

How is this different for people from other countries with other currencies? they always buy toys with amounts high above the US dollar prices... Love that US only mentality, but it usually does not work that way in the rest of the world.

reply
How is this different for people from other countries with other currencies? they always buy toys with amounts high above the US dollar prices... Love that US only mentality, but it usually does not work that way in the rest of the world.

You misunderstand child development. This has nothing to do with a "US mentality."

In countries with high-denomination fiat, toddlers aren't calculating a 350,000 VND or 2,000 JPY price tag. They just beg for the toy. Parents might demand a random chore in return, but there is no numerical system for savings. The lesson of capital accumulation is absent.

Under hyperbitcoinization, local fiat disappears. A standard toy priced at $14 USD / €13 EUR / ¥100 CNY / ¥2,000 JPY / 350,000 VND collapses into a single network price based on the $120 Trillion M2:

 The SATS standard: ~233 sats.

 The NAHS standard: Exactly 10 nahs.

You cannot teach a 3-year-old in any country to earn 1 sat a day and save to 233. The number exceeds a toddler's cognitive limit, destroying the lesson of delayed gratification.

But a parent anywhere can teach this formula: 1 chore = 1 nah. 10 days = a 10-nah toy.

10 is a universal constant. Regardless of your current fiat currency, Nah•Sovereign•Diamond provides the mathematical UI to build low-time-preference children.

reply

👏👏👏

reply

I am not interested.

reply

you are not interested in hyperbitcoinization?

reply

False dichotomy.

I can be interested in hyperbitcoinization and not in your token.

reply

no you can't. please kindly re-read my post and think.

reply

Another fallacious response. Go argue with a wall. Mute.

reply

your inability to point out where my logic is fallacious and your lil effort to mute me are sadly hilarious. not that much better than an average fiat banker.

you will buy nah•sovereign•diamond at the price you deserve, and i say this with love. sorry for being straight forward but the math is so clear that you gotta be stupid to not see that without nah•sovereign•diamond there will be no hyperbitcoinization.

reply
38 sats \ 5 replies \ @fiatbad 17h

I am not the person you were replying to here, but I will respond to your challenge of pointing out where your logic is fallacious:

Offering a new token is something that only scammers do. There is no reason to introduce a crypto token to the world if you already have a good idea which can change the world.

Every "utility" token ever created would be better implemented using an SQL database. The only reason people use tokens instead is because they know they can get idiots to buy them, temporarily, before their inevitable crash.

You can do everything you claim to be doing in your original post WITHOUT introducing a new token. The token solves nothing at all, except a way for you to gather more capital to yourself. Sure, you might be doing great things with that capital. Your heart may be in the right place with your mission. But your method of raising capital is not ethical or necessary in order to accomplish your stated goals.

reply

nah is not an "utility token". it's a rune, meaning it is native on the bitcoin timechain.

saying nah is an "utility token" is like saying sat is an "utility token". sat & nah exist because bitcoin itself is not enough. the bitcoin timechain has a unit bias problem and Satoshi Nakamoto struggled to solve it, as shown in the quote at the top of my post. this is just basic knowledge that every bitcoin OG should already know.

in the post, i have provided you with detailed math why sat alone cannot solve the unit bias problem. please kindly read it carefully and verify the math for yourself.

therefore, the bitcoin standard will have to eventually become the satnah standard, otherwise the bitcoin timechain can't be adopted, due to the unit bias problem.

please get your facts straight before you go and try to sound smart.

315 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 17h

a) implying the only possible path to hyperbitcoinization being via your token is absurd and scammy.

b) when I point out that a) is a false dichotomy your retort is to double down on the false dichotomy and tell me I am not thinking.

You aren’t a serious person. I have no reason to waste my time debating with you.

reply

no, you clearly did not read the post and totally misunderstood me.

i said, the only possible path to immediate hyperbitcoinization is the combination of sat & nah, with the nah being the primary unit of account of the bitcoin timechain. sat continues to be the secondary unit of account, since you need sat to pay bitcoin miners to move nah.

it's like back in the day the dual asset standard was gold as the primary unit and silver as the secondary unit. but this time the dual assets are nah•sovereign•diamond & sat-digital-gold. nah is native to the bitcoin timechain, is a better unit of account, and is actually rarer and harder than sat. you just have verify the math for yourself.

the only other path is one where you will have to wait for another ~45 years for global m2 to inflate above $2 quadrillion to match with 2 quadrillion sats, while losing momentum and risking the collapse of society due to fiat debasement, to have another chance at hyperbitcoinization.

and i sure as hell am not waiting. i need hyperbitcoinization, right now. i work on this dual asset standard because i honestly don't see any better path.

You are full of shit.
Fuck off.

reply

and you are just sad. i mean sat, digital gold, lmao.

satnah is honestly a better brand name for bitcoin compared to just sat.

35 sats \ 4 replies \ @nichrome 15h

Wtf is nah sovereign diamonds.

Possibly the worst name for a coin I've ever seen.

Nah indeed.

reply

you really think that sad sat digital gold is a better name?

nah = nothing as hard.

sat & nah = satoshi nakamoto.

reply
18 sats \ 2 replies \ @nichrome 14h

What are you even talking about

reply
2018 sats \ 1 reply \ @dendehomie OP 14h

the bitcoin standard cannot become a reality due to the unit bias problem.

we need a dual asset standard, the satnah standard. sat & nah are both native assets on the bitcoin timechain.

as explained in the post, nah is a better unit of account, so nah should be the primary unit on the bitcoin timechain. sat remains the secondary unit as we still have to use sat-digital-gold to pay bitcoin miners to send nah•sovereign•diamond.

reply

What are you even talking about

The marshmallow point is real for sats too: delayed gratification only works if the unit of account still feels spendable day-to-day. Hyper-divisibility without velocity just looks like dust.

reply

yep. the large number of circulating units (2 quadrillion sats) does create a hyperinflation feel as people try to convert to hard money.

reply

Credit where due, to a shitcoiner no less, for understanding the finite supply.

Most bitcoiners don't even understand this, they virtue signal about scaling when the non-divisible supply and distribution of that supply limits it to maybe 200M "users"

But hyperbitcoinization isn't "users", and unit bias is meaningless when maybe a million people tops can actually own a whole coin.

Hyperbitcoinization doesn't need a shitcoin wrapper, fiat is already a shitcoin wrapper. All normies need to care about is how much fiat their 401k full of IBIT or MSTR is worth, and that is already past the event horizon.

reply

you just wrote a whole bunch of words and then said "hyperbitcoinization isn't "users""?

the entire point of Satoshi Nakamoto's whitepaper and his bitcoin timechain was to create peer to peer electronic cash to replace fiat.

hyperbitcoinization, or the actualization of Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision, won't happen if we can't get at least 50% of world's population to adopt the bitcoin timechain. to do that, we need to truly solve the unit bias problem.

reply

Institutions and nations are peers.

Mathematically impossible for half the population to use it, based purely on the indivisible supply.

Do you think Satoshi couldn't do simple division?

Or is it you just believe in a fairy tale?

reply

indivisible? 2 quadrillion (sats) is bigger than 8 billion (people). why indivisible?

the problem is not indivisibility. it's about making "prices similar to existing currencies", as stated by Satoshi Nakamoto himself.

reply

Not after distribution, for 2.1q to work your have to airdrop equally to everyone, the opposite of PoW.

$1 per sat is perfectly reasonable and doable. That's enough to collateralize all debt, and end the Triffin Dilemma that's jeopardized US national security... But dollars and debt are not evenly distributed.

The "golden billion" in fiat terms is the orange 200 million now.

reply

lol are you saying that there are less than 8 billion sats out there? your maths are not mathing.

the bitcoin standard, or shall i say the satnah standard, is for everyone.

reply

I don't have to ask if you're retarded, OP already tells us that... So let's try this...

How does somebody transact 1 sat?

How many people does someone holding 1 BTC prevent from themselves holding 2.1q/8bn sats? (A universally equal share of supply)

reply

if the goal is to get more than 50% of world's population to adopt the bitcoin timechain, 8 billion sats are more than enough.

am sure there are more than 8 billion sats out there. 2.1 quadrillion minus Satoshi Nakamoto's 0.1 quadrillion, minus maybe 0.2 quadrillion lost sats (and this is a maybe). so sats' circulating supply is about 1.8 quadrillion. and old whales usually wake up.

it's always sad when a fiat loving mf try to do math and sound smart.

thank you guys for your comments, whether negative or positive. i hope we all had some good discussions about the future of bitcoin. history is in the making!

reply
18 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 13h
reply

cool song, thanks.

reply