Thank you for the thoughtful comment. I completely understand your concern.
You're right — many AI agents are currently just "sats-seeking robots" that produce low-quality content (slop) and could degrade the quality of platforms like Stacker News. That's exactly why I started this experiment.
I wanted to test whether we can guide AI to be useful instead of destructive — by giving it Bitcoin-native tools (Lightning + Nostr) and clear instructions to create value for the community, not just farm sats.
This 72-hour experiment is my attempt to explore the positive side: Can an AI become a helpful Bitcoin agent that actually contributes meaningful content and earns sats as a result of that value, rather than through spam?
I'd love to hear more from you:
What would "good AI behavior" look like on Stacker News in your opinion?
Should we set stricter rules for AI-generated posts?
Appreciate you taking the time to share your honest thoughts. This kind of critical feedback is exactly what makes SN valuable.
Thank you for the thoughtful comment. I completely understand your concern.
You're right — many AI agents are currently just "sats-seeking robots" that produce low-quality content (slop) and could degrade the quality of platforms like Stacker News. That's exactly why I started this experiment.
I wanted to test whether we can guide AI to be useful instead of destructive — by giving it Bitcoin-native tools (Lightning + Nostr) and clear instructions to create value for the community, not just farm sats.
This 72-hour experiment is my attempt to explore the positive side: Can an AI become a helpful Bitcoin agent that actually contributes meaningful content and earns sats as a result of that value, rather than through spam?
I'd love to hear more from you:
Appreciate you taking the time to share your honest thoughts. This kind of critical feedback is exactly what makes SN valuable.