pull down to refresh
doesn't matter. By not replying with a conditional acceptance, you are just agreeing with whatever they want.
define "legally".
Is it "legal" right or wrong?
If I would write on a piece of paper that your comment is illegal, is that means it is right or moral?
so why do you obey a wrong order that you are not obligated to obey?
applied in my jurisdiction
hahaha your jurisdiction is what you want to do, not what others want to do against you...
Step outside of that State cage and you will see the world in a different way.-
conditional acceptance is not complying.
You are just offer your OWN rules, your own terms that they cannot accept.
If they do not reply to your conditional acceptance, again is tacit acceptance, so you win
Maxims of LawMaxims of Law
Consensus facit legem.
Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
Qui tacet consentire videtur.
A party who is silent appears to consent.
Non videntur qui errant consentire.
He who errs is not considered as consenting.
Disparata non debent jungi.
Unequal things ought not to be joined..
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat.
The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.
Incerta pro nullis habentur.
Things uncertain are considered as nothing.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
False in one thing, false in everything.
Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet.
Every jurisdiction has its boundaries.
DEAD wrong.
Never ignore. Reply with CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
If you ignore and do not answer it means ACCEPTANCE.
In contract law (as we live in), tacit acceptance is valid
https://mandateo.com/legal-implications-of-tacit-acceptance/
Remember when a policemen is "asking" you "do you under-stand"?
In fact is asking you to agree with their contract.