pull down to refresh

OK I raise a challenge among SN stackers.
Show /explain me how recently you literally FUCK THE GOVERNMENT or at least defy it in such way they cannot touch you.

Best case get my sats. And if you really impress me, you can get 21k sats
I know that most of you do not like CCs, but you are too stupid to know that on SN 1CC = 1 sat and don't know how to use properly the CCs

10,000 sats bounty
DarthCoin's bounties
133 sats \ 5 replies \ @Lux 17h

Nice try FED ;)

reply

sadly people don't know how to fuck the FED and gov.,..

reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lux 15h

learned helplesness

reply

@DarthCoin is an NSA agent.

Mission to infiltrate and gain operational knowledge of the Bitcoin and Libertarian community.

Do not be fooled by his virtue signalling Bullshit.

Fuck the NSA infiltrator spook.

reply
reply

@Darthcoin is an NSA spook.

Fucking Virtue Signalling HYPOCRITE.

reply

Ignored and tore up "mandatory jury eligibility form".

This is the third time I have done so.

reply

Please details

reply

That's the details. Mandatory jury eligibility form arrived in the mail. I am supposed to fill it so they can put me on the list for jury duty. I did not. I tore it up and threw it in the garbage. They send me this form every few years but I ignore it every time.

reply
They send me this form every few years but I ignore it every time.

DEAD wrong.
Never ignore. Reply with CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE.
If you ignore and do not answer it means ACCEPTANCE.

In contract law (as we live in), tacit acceptance is valid

https://mandateo.com/legal-implications-of-tacit-acceptance/

Remember when a policemen is "asking" you "do you under-stand"?
In fact is asking you to agree with their contract.

reply

What are the conditions?

reply

doesn't matter. By not replying with a conditional acceptance, you are just agreeing with whatever they want.

reply

"In Ontario, the concept of "tacit acceptance" does not legally apply to jury selection."

reply

define "legally".
Is it "legal" right or wrong?

If I would write on a piece of paper that your comment is illegal, is that means it is right or moral?

isn’t he complying with gov if he does what you suggest?

I think the tearing of the form was much more assertive

reply

conditional acceptance is not complying.
You are just offer your OWN rules, your own terms that they cannot accept.
If they do not reply to your conditional acceptance, again is tacit acceptance, so you win

Maxims of LawMaxims of Law

Consensus facit legem. 

Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. 

A party who is silent appears to consent.

Non videntur qui errant consentire. 

He who errs is not considered as consenting.

Disparata non debent jungi. 

Unequal things ought not to be joined..

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. 

The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.

Incerta pro nullis habentur. 

Things uncertain are considered as nothing.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. 

False in one thing, false in everything.

Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet. 

Every jurisdiction has its boundaries.

reply

Interesting. Thanks

reply

you absolute rebel

reply
12 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 6h

I fucked the Russian government by helping my friends kill their hired thugs:

#1506620

reply

Does not voting count as fuc* the government?

edit: FUCK FUCK FUCK

reply

If you want to be re-instate in this contest, promise you will say / post a meme on SN every day, regarding FUCK THE STATE.

reply

That’s an impossible task. FUCK your contest! ahahah

reply

You are the number one shitposter on SN. Is not an impossible task...
But yet again, you reject to be an anti-gov... aka statist.

reply

It’s a pleasure to be number one shitposter. Thanks!

reply

sometimes I want to be the 1st shitposter on SN, but due to my complicated schedule I cannot beat you :)
So please keep going! Somebody have to be that shitposter ...

reply
But yet again, you reject to be an anti-gov... aka statist.

Yeah, we’ve talked about this before. I’ll just say I think there’s gotta be a government, not in its current form, but there has to be some kind of minimal one. Otherwise it’d just turn into total wild anarchy!

reply
I think there’s gotta be a government

Totally statist thinking. Unrecoverable.
Let's go to basics...

Welcome to be be fucked by anybody else... enjoy being fucked over and over you whole fucking life.

reply

If everyone were like me, we wouldn’t even need a government. I’ve been hearing that for ages!

reply

Luckily the world have people like ME (Darth) that can keep the world in BALANCE. Not like you, obedient slave shitizen.

And before being triggered by the word "slave" please watch this

and

just by typing "fuc*" you are disqualified for the contest.
Censoring yourself is a sign of obedience to the gov,.

reply

~lol~lol

that’s a joke! Censorship would be if I wrote f*** or ****!

reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 17h -21 sats

I know you are a full statist.
You are disqualified for this contest.

I'm approaching my first thousand dollars, bought little by little via clean, traceless P2P transactions on the Network Link.

Now that the amount justifies the mainnet fees, I'll make the on-chain jump to a cold wallet.

I know that for many here it might be an insignificant amount, but for others it's a lot of money and hard work to save up.

-> I have also accepted some jobs outside my regular job and requested payment in Bitcoin.

reply

Sorry but just by saying "my first thousand dollars, bought little by little via clean," you show me you are still a fiat maxi.
That means: statist.
Change your mindset and try again.

reply

I'll try.

reply

right approach.

reply
I know that for many here it might be an insignificant amount, but for others it's a lot of money and hard work to save up.

Yes, is a good case, but not enough.
I've started like you, in 2012, saving, every fucking bit in sats. I know is not easy, especially nowadays.

But please understand that saving / stacking sats is not enough.

reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @guerratotal 16h
stand that saving / stacking sats is not enough.

I know, but for now I'm focusing more on that, and on studying well, so I don't waste them unnecessarily.

reply
reply

deleted by author

reply

That is a good sign into the right direction. Keep us posted about hos is going on

reply

Sorry for deleting the post, I remembered I could edit it and decided to add it to the original.

reply

ok zapped you for the effort

reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 10h

Many years ago, I was the recipient of a grant.
This grant was given to me by country A to work in country B.

Governments tax this kind of grant.
A and B have an agreement precluding double taxation.

Country A wanted to tax me, I told them country B already taxed me.
Country B wanted to tax me, I told them country A already taxed me.

Neither of them taxed me.

reply
  1. I cannot give bounty to anon
  2. Avoiding taxes is not defying govs. Is just cheating a contract. That means not RIGHT.
  3. Show me how you REBUT govs authority not how you avoid their threat. Is not the same thing.
reply
reply

"stack sats" is only useless virtue signaling.
The hard part is when people start demanding to be paid in bitcoin...
Only that first step of demanding REQUIRE to have big balls....

reply

How about Bitcoin in action?

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 12h -30 sats

@DarthCoin does not even use sats here on SNs because his NSA handler does not allow it.

Fuck @Darthcoin and the NSA he works for.

I used bitcoin to buy stuff

reply

try harder.
You can use bitcoin but in the same time voting or supporting politicians.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 12h -30 sats

You work fir the NSA.
Fuck you NSA cunt.

Every single second my wealth sits in a self-sovereign, open-source cold wallet is a direct middle finger to the state.They can’t freeze it. They can’t inflate it. They can’t confiscate it. By running my own node and holding my own keys, I completely strip away their jurisdiction over my future. They can issue all the regulatory threats they want—they are utterly powerless against math. ⚡✊

reply

try harder.
You can use bitcoin but in the same time voting or supporting politicians.

reply

Who said anything about voting? I don't try to change the system from within; I build the parallel system that makes them obsolete. When you completely opt out financially, their ballots don't mean a thing.

reply
  • did you still use a govID?
  • did you still use a bank account?
  • did you still accept fiat?
  • did you still obey gov rules?

Bitcoin fixes something but not all.

reply

GovID and banks are handcuffs we are all born into, but I am actively breaking the chains. I minimize bank usage to a ghost account strictly for unavoidable bills, accept sats over fiat every chance I get, and treat their arbitrary rules as nothing more than speed bumps. You don’t kill Leviathan overnight—you starve it slowly by bleeding your wealth into Bitcoin.

reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 12h -30 sats

@Darthcoin works for the NSA.
Stop being conned by this state durveillance mole who pretends to be a Bitcoiner but does not even use sats here on SNs.
The state surveillance cunt @DarthCoin is pulling the wool.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 12h -30 sats

@DarthCoin is an NSA mole infiltrating anti government community of Bitcoiners.

Fuck NSA and its spook @DarthCoin.

Government security agencies will seek to infiltrater any group where anti government sentiment is expressed- they are doing their job and @DarthCoin works for them.