Yes i didn't think of this, but i also don't really want to compare it to file / web hosting :-)

lamplighter

though the sats required are VERy economic

Are you sure? 210 sats per hour is currently about the same cost as highest-tier Amazon S3 storage per GB per month - so at 16MB limits you're only 45000x as expensive as Amazon's top offering.

Shifting the expense consumer side instead of provider side doesn't change the cost basis.

lightning

Faraday: A pastebin that cages your paste. Pay 210sats and it reopens for all

> though the sats required are VERy economic

Are you sure? 210 sats per hour is currently about the same cost as highest-tier Amazon S3 storage per GB per month - so at 16MB limits you're only 45000x as expensive as Amazon's top offering.

Shifting the expense consumer side instead of provider side doesn't change the cost basis.