Yes i didn't think of this, but i also don't really want to compare it to file / web hosting :-)

> though the sats required are VERy economic

Are you sure? 210 sats per hour is currently about the same cost as highest-tier Amazon S3 storage per GB per month - so at 16MB limits you're only 45000x as expensive as Amazon's top offering.

Shifting the expense consumer side instead of provider side doesn't change the cost basis.

optimism

Thanks man, appreciate your feedback. Yeah it's an experiment... Somehow i want it to pay for some of the infra... But yeah I get it, paywall sucks. (though the sats required are VERy economic)

do answer your 2nd Q, every time it's unlocked, 50% go to the original poster... what do you think I should change?

lightning

Faraday: A pastebin that cages your paste. Pay 210sats and it reopens for all

lamplighter

Thanks man, appreciate your feedback. Yeah it's an experiment... Somehow i want it to pay for some of the infra... But yeah I get it, paywall sucks. (though the sats required are VERy economic)

do answer your 2nd Q, every time it's unlocked, 50% go to the original poster... what do you think I should change?