pull down to refresh
I'm down for good discussion about it.
i only heard of drivechains a few years ago, but they've been an idea for 10+ years. when I heard of them, I immediately felt "this is sus & shitcoins"
in the last few years I've been bummed to see SBR & MSTR & bitcoin backed Fiat loans.
I'm less of a toxic maxi these days and more of a "NGU is cool and all, but have you ever tried orange pilling your local merchants and building a parallel economy to obviate the state?" kinda guy. or maybe I'm still a very toxic maxi, and I would prefer to see the left adopt ecash and get the things we all want (a class struggle instead of a culture war).
so, I think abandoning corporate bitcoin and fiat loans and keeping our day jobs and not getting bought out by Strategay and Blackfuck and whatever the shit... would be preferable if we could bring the clever and creative bluehair devs who went stupid on ETH back into the fold of a new brand that doesn't have all the baggage.
have you read the "why hard fork" section of the website? I think it's worth it to understand what's being encouraged.
I hope ODELL will read it, too... because maybe if I'm too stupid to understand why this is a bad development then I need somebody to tell me how to think
look i know enough to KNOW i dont know enough.
but redistributing coins, is a non starter.
so the why hardfork, to me, personally, is irrelevant.
hardfork to get BIP300&301
I don't like redistribution either
so when you were referring to rugging the bankers, you meant mining companies?
cause thats how im interpreting it now since we are talking mining specifically.
ill admit, mining and that whole part isnt my strong suite, so i dont have much of a rebuttal in that sense.
i think MOST people here can see the desire for smaller blocks, and to be honest, your descriptions of smaller blocks helping small miners/ low bandwith miners is great. but once again at this cost(redistributing coins, premine etc) its just not worth it.
just my 2 sats.