I've already given perfectly sane reasons why someone might not have a linked Lightning wallet, whilst still being sovereign. I've also explained that it's improper of you to presume that all Bitcoin users should event *want* to have completely sovereign control of their funds anyway. There are perfectly legitimate use cases for Bitcoin whilst not having completely sovereign control of funds. If you still choose to ignore such realities despite them being highlighted to you, that's your prerogative.

You also seem to have misunderstood my comment. What I'm saying is that you shouldn't shout "hypocrite!" without having irrefutable proof of hypocrisy.

jivan

Largely unrelated to the current dialogue but Yes!

When someone is claiming to be a Bitcoiner but does not actually use Bitcoin as a P2P payments protocol in reality, they are a posturing virtue signalling hypocrite.

It is verified when they admit they can't be fucked attaching LN wallets because its 'too hard' or because 'CCs always work'.

Solidarity protest against discriminatory zap practices

SimpleStacker

Largely unrelated to the current dialogue but Yes! 

When someone is claiming to be a Bitcoiner but does not actually use Bitcoin as a P2P payments protocol in reality, they are a posturing virtue signalling hypocrite.

It is verified when they admit they can't be fucked attaching LN wallets because its 'too hard' or because 'CCs always work'.