pull down to refresh

I agree that leasing from randoms is not viable.

however, it's not likely that mass onboarding to bitcoin will be thanks to existing wallets growing, it will be existing payment service providers (with billions of users) adding lightning support

and they will do that by acquiring liquidity from other businesses running routing nodes, not random individual node runners, because they can't rely on a single individual for their topology and capacity

they'll also run ark servers, and will likely need external bitcoin-rich businesses provide the liqudity needed for those servers.

hey dumbass, even if you and a bunch of idiots will use that crap ark, you will still need a LN node with liquidity to make the swap for you.

Your whole "business model" is based in the hope that everybody will use your crap network. That will NEVER happen.

You are literally this guy

reply

hey retard, who said i'm against lightning

reply

It is very clear now that you are a "reformed" shitcoiner that lost his stupid "yield" on shitcoins anow you want to bring shitcoineries on bitcoin.
So STFU

reply

that would be hilarious if true

openark doesn't require any protocol changes, nobody's forcing you to run it

be mad somewhere else

reply

Ark adds 0 to this, it's crypto theater, the only use case for it is scamming non technical users too lazy to run a real node into thinking they have self custody from a phone

reply

No you need a cloud agent obviously. Read it openark.tech

reply