pull down to refresh
I agree that leasing from randoms is not viable.
however, it's not likely that mass onboarding to bitcoin will be thanks to existing wallets growing, it will be existing payment service providers (with billions of users) adding lightning support
and they will do that by acquiring liquidity from other businesses running routing nodes, not random individual node runners, because they can't rely on a single individual for their topology and capacity
they'll also run ark servers, and will likely need external bitcoin-rich businesses provide the liqudity needed for those servers.
hey dumbass, even if you and a bunch of idiots will use that crap ark, you will still need a LN node with liquidity to make the swap for you.
Your whole "business model" is based in the hope that everybody will use your crap network. That will NEVER happen.
You are literally this guy
hey retard, who said i'm against lightning
It is very clear now that you are a "reformed" shitcoiner that lost his stupid "yield" on shitcoins anow you want to bring shitcoineries on bitcoin.
So STFU
that would be hilarious if true
openark doesn't require any protocol changes, nobody's forcing you to run it
be mad somewhere else
Ark adds 0 to this, it's crypto theater, the only use case for it is scamming non technical users too lazy to run a real node into thinking they have self custody from a phone
No you need a cloud agent obviously. Read it openark.tech
There's already plenty of leasing marketplaces without DeFi theater, and they're a dead end, because merchants that need channels to be reliable aren't leasing channels from randos when they can simply self-peer along an optimized route #1448231
Whatever DeFi shithole you crawled out of isn't reality