pull down to refresh

122 sats \ 6 replies \ @Scoresby OP 17 Dec \ on: Supertestnet's gotcha: BIP16 also confiscated coins bitcoin
Here is @theinstagibbs reply to Super:
source
write
preview
121 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scoresby OP 17 Dec
And a follow-up by @bluematt:
source
reply
203 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 17 Dec
Further down, Matt says "You’re basically saying we cannot do soft forks at all". I fully agree with that. Super is still right to call out BIP16, but it was done before good standards for soft forks existed. The point to make is: let's not do it like that again. Just like satoshi's removal of OP_CAT... we should be careful to not repeat that and call it out if it is proposed in the present.
Can't change the past short of rewriting history.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 10h
Here is the continuation of Corallo's thread:
source
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 10h
https://twiiit.com/liminalbolt/status/2001683378433602010
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 17 Dec
https://twiiit.com/TheBlueMatt/status/2001382219357815241
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 17 Dec
https://twiiit.com/theinstagibbs/status/2001102931785855164
reply