pull down to refresh

Even though there was some AI-related vol in U.S. equity markets last week (#1611978), the U.S. economy is doing great. (Don't believe the haters, huh! #1599758, #1608876)

Markets steadied.
After Thursday’s near-catastrophic sell-off, led by AI stocks, Friday’s jobs report came in unexpectedly strong, both in terms of jobs added and a 4.1 per cent unemployment rate. [...] How a broadly sturdy US economy has been a key counterbalance to a US stock market that has been wobbly since the spring.

Cool lil liftoff graph

"consider the long-term trend in real wage growth"

YES; that shit is exxactly my point in that anti-progress piece. #1608876

oh but there's sturdy econ growth and look at all these wonderful new AI gadgets? Life is great.
https://x.com/joakimbook/status/2120156273354395832

Real wages are growing, but barely, and not for long if the current trend persists. Combine this with price levels that are a third or so higher than before the pandemic and the restive electorate is easy to understand.

LADY has a point.


also, interview with Mark Blyth, int/public affairs prof at Brown. Some nice extracts:

The AI bubble unravelling is killing us all, ouch. Dude is, uh, optimistic?

I call it the barbell from hell. It’s perfectly balanced. On the one hand, you have a technology that can create Great Depression levels of unemployment, where people already have zero faith in institutions. On the other side of the barbell, you have a financial crisis that generates second-hand quasi-Great Depression levels of unemployment.

---

archive: https://archive.md/ukwh2

132 sats \ 6 replies \ @Scoresby 4h
a financial mass-casualty event

well that sounds fun.

I'm surprised real wage growth is positive at all. If inflation is running at 4%, wouldn't a 1% real wage growth imply 5% nominal wage growth?

reply

Yep. Keep in mind that it can only track people who continue to have jobs. The others are not counted as -100%.

reply
157 sats \ 3 replies \ @optimism 3h

I found this chart from Wolf Richter interesting:

The narration:

[T]he share of the output that goes to labor drops – though each of the remaining employees gets paid more as their productivity has risen.
reply

It looks different when you combine labor and tools. Basically, you have to be thought of now as you plus the tools needed for your craft.

I also wonder if that includes expenses towards compliance with labor regulations.

reply
82 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 3h

Only if I can bring my own tools. If not, then please do not conflate the value of my sovereign self with that overpriced inferior database software Altman sold ya.

reply

If you’re bringing your own tools make sure you’re compensated for it

reply
If inflation is running at 4%, wouldn't a 1% real wage growth imply 5% nominal wage growth?

yes. I'm not sure about the underlying stats (haven't looked into this topic in detail). Is that 5-10% in recent years in doubt? The boomers automatically got quite a lot in recent years + the extreme AI/engineer salaries pulling up the mean


also, yes. Me too. I first misread the chart for dipping into negative terrotiry (real) but appearently not.

reply

Declining real wage growth is still real wage growth…unless of course it isn’t actually real wage growth.

reply

wonderfully poetic, sir.

Den subconsciously: I wonder what it means... -.-

reply

If you could hear my inflection it would make sense

reply

we need audio emojis on SN

reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @twiiit 5h

https://twiiit.com/joakimbook/status/2120156273354395832 [1]

  1. ⚠ bot funded by the community → zap this comment or send sats to twiiit@rizful.com to make this footnote disappear. ↩

reply