pull down to refresh

would you be persuadable by a comment like "be the kind of person that would make the world a better place if there were more of them"?

so, not an appeal to personal benefits, but some kind of appeal to social or moral duty

I’m very open to arguments like that. I make a lot of choices for reasons like that. The difference is that there are real benefits that do accrue to someone/something: for example buying organic or humane certified products or a lot of matters of etiquette. There are some direct benefits to me, but it’s mostly about not poisoning places I don’t live in and not harming creatures that I don’t know.

I’m not sympathetic to it here because the action is demonstrably unimpactful, which means there are better uses for my time.

reply