pull down to refresh

Robert Reich argues that Trump’s attacks on history, education, science, journalism, and the arts follow one strategy: weaken people’s ability to question power and make them easier to control.

  1. Rewrite history to make today’s authority harder to challenge.
    Erasing past injustices, and the movements that overcame them, discourages people from demanding change now.
    Example: Reich points to efforts to whitewash slavery and segregation and erase Native American suffering and LGBTQ rights struggles.
  2. Replace independent thinking with political loyalty.
    Reich argues that weakening education while controlling what schools teach shifts their purpose from developing judgment to demanding allegiance.
    Example: He cites efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, cut school funding, and influence university admissions, faculty hiring, and curricula.
  3. Weaken science because evidence can contradict the leader.
    Independent research establishes facts that political authority cannot simply decree away. Undermining it also carries practical costs for everyone.
    Example: Reich cites frozen university research grants and attacks on scientific agencies that threaten progress against cancer, Alzheimer’s, and HIV.
  4. Pressure the press to control what the public can know.
    Journalism enables citizens to scrutinize authority; intimidating news organizations weakens that accountability.
    Example: He points to lawsuits against ABC and CBS, broadcast-license threats, and efforts to defund PBS and NPR.
  5. Control the arts to narrow expression and silence dissent.
    Art encourages people to question assumptions, understand others, and imagine alternatives, all of which can challenge concentrated power.
    Example: Reich cites canceled arts grants, intervention in Smithsonian content, and Trump’s installation as Kennedy Center chair.
  6. The combined effect is a public less equipped to govern itself.
    Reich’s central warning is that these actions reinforce one another: less knowledge, fewer independent voices, and less empathy make division through fear easier.
    Example: A public denied the history of successful protest, and institutions that explain or challenge present policies, has fewer tools to recognize and resist abuses.