didn't internal data at OpenAI show that the most common queries were about travel itineraries
apparently not
https://m.stacker.news/160416
Assuming it were though, researching stuff to do at a given place is much different than giving the clanker access to your Airline accounts, picking seats/meals/layovers/departure/arrival times. There's usually trade-offs with that too, it'd take more effort to have a clanker do it right than just selecting a few drop downs on google flights and hitting select.
If there's a use-case for AI here, it's probably just google flights having a chat bot instead of clickable components, even that's a stretch IMO.
On-the-ground itinerary is probably good for the most NPC people, I know an NPC who recently used Claude for his on-the-ground itinerary for a trip to Japan. Most boring normie trip imaginable, seems like Claude was just an abstraction over Frommer's guide. When he told me/showed pics all I could think of was this mf:
apparently not
https://m.stacker.news/160416
Assuming it were though, researching stuff to do at a given place is much different than giving the clanker access to your Airline accounts, picking seats/meals/layovers/departure/arrival times. There's usually trade-offs with that too, it'd take more effort to have a clanker do it right than just selecting a few drop downs on google flights and hitting select.
If there's a use-case for AI here, it's probably just google flights having a chat bot instead of clickable components, even that's a stretch IMO.
On-the-ground itinerary is probably good for the most NPC people, I know an NPC who recently used Claude for his on-the-ground itinerary for a trip to Japan. Most boring normie trip imaginable, seems like Claude was just an abstraction over Frommer's guide. When he told me/showed pics all I could think of was this mf:
https://m.stacker.news/160419
Didn't experience the place at all.