Why would each Lightning user choose to pay an additional 10 byte overhead by themselves instead of splitting that cost with other coinjoin participants? Coinjoining to open your Lightning channel is the economically rational choice.

Splitting overhead does not remove overhead, you still need to get into your scam in the first place vs. just sending a payment.

Keep showing the noobs how you grift them, standing up a honeypot to dox their coins, gauge with fees just to harvest data, and spend their now-doxxed sats on SN to try hiding the truth and pump your scam.

Btw, how much is interpol paying you to keep Wasabi afloat?

justin_shocknet

Since there's those added costs privacy is ultimately the product, which combined makes it honeypot.

Coinjoins save money because 10 bytes of transaction overhead gets split between participants. The savings get even greater after cross input signature aggregation is enabled.

You have already failed. Keep crying about coinjoins. They reduce fees and increase privacy, even for Lightning users.

bitcoin

lightning

Coinjoins

Turn CoinJoin change into shared Lightning liquidity

m0wer

>Since there's those added costs privacy is ultimately the product, which combined makes it honeypot.

Coinjoins save money because 10 bytes of transaction overhead gets split between participants. The savings get even greater after cross input signature aggregation is enabled.

You have already failed. Keep crying about coinjoins. They reduce fees and increase privacy, even for Lightning users.