pull down to refresh

Someone doesn't want the party to end

One of the top 5!!

reply
reply

Very helpful

reply

Now you know, if you not, no worries...have fun..enjoy the downzaps.

reply
27 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 23h -50 sats

I was being sarcastic. You had already reduced it to the two possible people who are known. I can't infer much with the information that it might be two rather than three different unknown people.

Not sure if it’s worth it, but a good strategy to beat the downzapper might be to create a link post linking back to the original post, since the original already has a high downzap value. aahah

reply
128 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby 19h

what's relevant for visibility is the difference -- so a post that has been downzapped 101,000 sats but boosted 100,000 sats will rank higher than a post that was only downzapped 2000 sats and not boosted at all. The raw amount of sats downzapped isn't as important as the net investment (zaps + boosts - downzaps).

So starting over with a new post that links to an older downzapped post doesn't help other than that the person downzapping the post might not notice right away.

Also, I think there is some amount of notoriety for being highly downzapped, so a link strategy might result in fewer people viewing your post because it disperses the downzaps across multiple posts.

reply
145 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 19h

Probably a dumb idea, but at that exact moment teh post were down 100k vs 8k up. The point was to push a new post to the front page, where 10k up was more than enough back then.

reply
65 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 19h

Ah yes, that makes sense. I had misunderstood. This is why smart downzappers never spend more than they need to in order to bury a post.

reply

I think the idea here was that the 100k downzap came after about 7k of zaps, so it would cost 93k to overcome that directly.

Just making the link post regained visibility for only another 244 sats.

reply

Let's see what happens!

reply

lmao sneaky

reply