I'd guess it's because this has been discussed extensively over the last week (e.g. there's already a post on the frontpage discussing related issues), let alone over the last months, and whoever downzapped it is upset at seeing more, in their view, naive takes on what @k00b should do.
Because someone does not like it? I don't think so.
It's going to be very hard having a productive discussion when we assume what's in other people's heads.
If someone doesn't like it, he can comment here and express his disagreement.
They could and I hope they do, but given the current algorithm, it's also acceptable for them to attempt to curate their and others' experiences by downzapping content - just like it's acceptable for the anyone who agrees with you to upzap this content.
I'd guess it's because this has been discussed extensively over the last week (e.g. there's already a post on the frontpage discussing related issues), let alone over the last months, and whoever downzapped it is upset at seeing more, in their view, naive takes on what @k00b should do.
It's going to be very hard having a productive discussion when we assume what's in other people's heads.
They could and I hope they do, but given the current algorithm, it's also acceptable for them to attempt to curate their and others' experiences by downzapping content - just like it's acceptable for the anyone who agrees with you to upzap this content.