pull down to refresh

We removed it because it would incentivize territory founders to post spam and scams to attract downzaps.

I feel the split should be similar to boosts, so at least the OP gets a partial refund.

OP never got a portion of downzaps so I'm not sure what you mean.

It seems to me the game switched to having some top stackers posting crap for it to be downzapped and get more rewards out of it.

reply

So how else are territory founders* incentivized to downzap if they know someone else gonna do it for them?

* edited

reply
112 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

They get paid from the boost/zaps/posting fees. If they want to downzap it they can use those funds at 0 cost.

reply

Ever consider giving territory owners the right to simply remove a post outright?

If cross-posted, I would envision that the territory owner can simply remove the territory tag from a post (while refunding the poster the posting fee). If all territory owners remove the territory tag from a post, the post disappears.

Yes, it gives territory owners the ability to censor within their own territories, but as long as one territory owner doesn't do that, people will always have a place to post on SN.

reply

Is that not what can happen in moderated territories?

reply

maybe, I don't know. I haven't explored all the territory tools tbh

reply

I've never toggled on moderation, either. It seems like it must mean that posts can be removed from the territory.

reply

I just went to territory settings and didn't see an option for that... hmm

reply
112 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 10 Sep

It's been removed. This was pointed out to me yesterday, I didn't know either.

Feels like a great idea. Well, why censor? The post will still be accessible from the profile page.

reply

Who is they?

reply

If we need more downzapping, the next move might be to make a mirror version of the rewards pool that distributes all the downzaps amongst the best downzappers.

reply