Again, you're drawing strange conclusions and projecting very odd motivations onto me.
If there were more than 140,000 people in the Flint area (there were), then what you've shown is that even poisoning the municipal water supply will leave many unexposed. Since that was exactly my point, I'm not sure what it is you think you're demonstrating here?
Again, you're drawing strange conclusions and projecting very odd motivations onto me.
If there were more than 140,000 people in the Flint area (there were), then what you've shown is that even poisoning the municipal water supply will leave many unexposed. Since that was exactly my point, I'm not sure what it is you think you're demonstrating here?