pull down to refresh
It is an op-return included with a transaction moving the stolen funds. Isn't that evidence enough of who sent it? Or am I missing something here?
reply
pull down to refresh
It is an op-return included with a transaction moving the stolen funds. Isn't that evidence enough of who sent it? Or am I missing something here?
No signature so anybody could have posted that.
But Blockstream would know if this is where the conversation is at if they've already received the same thing signed and encrypted to them.