pull down to refresh

Was ~security too expensive?

Yes. And I’ve noticed from my own experience that posts I publish just in ~security don’t get much traction. When I cross-post, it ends up getting pretty expensive if I include him.

3 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 9 Sep

Interesting, thank you. This is very valuable feedback. I’m not sure yet what I’ll do with it, though.

Maybe there’s more feedback from others?

reply

You should think about how often a post will be exclusive to ~security.

If that's uncommon, then you need to think about what the total cost of posts will be that are cross-posted with it and how likely someone is to recoup their sats.

For me, the ~econ fees had to come down because those posts often also include other territories, but ~Stacker_Sports was fine because those are usually solo.

reply
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 9 Sep
You should think about how often a post will be exclusive to ~security.

Oh, interesting, I think that’s exactly what I’ve been thinking about with @ctfbot_

reply

I post my write-ups there because it's where it belongs, never noticed 100sats was expensive, maybe because I don't post new items enough and in enough Territories to compare 🤔

reply

It really depends on your goals.

If you want ~security to be a place stackers subscribe to for PSAs, then you need minimal post fees, i.e. 5 sats, slightly higher comment fees and curate posts hard through zaps in both ways. If you want it to be ~privacy "lite" then I'd recommend to just cut it in half.

reply
149 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Sep

I want stackers to have a place for anything ~security-related, without spam or moderation necessary on my part.

I want to recoup some of the costs with exclusive ~security events (@ctfbot_) and territory.watch/security to monitor the revenue (still need to update it regularly).

reply

I'll let you know when you're territory is so good, I subscribed.

reply

I'd go with 33 for posts and 3 for comments.

reply