All A's are B's.
No B's are C's.
Which conclusion is necessarily true?
A) No A's are C's.
B) All C's are A's.
C) Some B's are A's.
D) No C exists.
Comment ✍️ and win ⚡⚡
Be free, accumulate ⚡💥 and don't trust anyone.
1,000 sats paid 2 times
pull down to refresh
All A's are B's.
No B's are C's.
Which conclusion is necessarily true?
A) No A's are C's.
B) All C's are A's.
C) Some B's are A's.
D) No C exists.
Comment ✍️ and win ⚡⚡
Be free, accumulate ⚡💥 and don't trust anyone.
Hey, TODAY🫵 I finished one of my surveys. Thanks to everyone for participating⚡⚡.
The participants. @Machiavelli23 and @flat24 have earned the reward for this survey.
Be free, accumulate ⚡💥 and don't trust anyone.
Excellent, thank you very much; I’ll keep an eye out for your posts in case there are any other bonuses.
thank you
D) No C exists
If all A’s are B’s and No B’s are C’s than it would mean “all” is either A or B so the lack B “No B’s are C’s” would mean that No C exists.
A) No A's are C's.
No A is C.
Here's the step-by-step reasoning:
All A's are B's: This means that the set of "A's" is completely contained within the set of "B's". If something is an A, it must necessarily be a B.
No B's are C's: This means that the sets of "B's" and "C's" have no intersection; they are completely separate.
If you take any element that is an A, you'll first know that it's a B (by the first rule). But since it's a B, and no B can be a C (by the second rule), then that element cannot be a C.
Logical conclusion: The intersection of A and C is empty.
No A's are C's
A) No A's are C's.
Please justify your answer
if all A’s are B’s they cannot be C’s because that would mean a member of B was also a member of C and the second statement disallows that condition.
Not sure if I get this right but here is how I see it.
All elements of the set A belong to B. No elements of the set B belong to C.
Hence No elements of A are in C seems correct to me. Answer A seems right.
All elements of C belong to A contradicts the second statement. Answer B seems false.
Some elements of B are A seems right to me as the first statement says that all elements of A are in B.
I am not a native English speaker but I understand the last statement as the set C does not exist, which seems false fo me given the second statement.
My answer is A is necessarily true.
A) No A's are C's
Please justify your answer
a.