pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 1 Sep \ parent \ on: @ccbank's bio
It requires an additional roundtrip for the lightning invoice.

Just to make sure I got this right: right now, a transaction requires 1 comment from the CC seller and 2 from the bot. With my approach, it would be 2 from the bot and 2 from the seller. Is that right?

write
compose
22 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 1 Sep

Yes. Roundtrips / Interactivity requirements are terrible for UX and DX.

(I should have said 0.5 roundtrips, because asking for a lightning invoice means there’s one message more, not two, like in a roundtrip.)

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 1 Sep

It’s a personal choice, but I’d rather not risk the CC seller not having enough CCs and having to generate another invoice and submit another order. Plus, I think it’s clearer for the CC seller, even if it means one extra comment.

reply