pull down to refresh
buyer should zap 10000ccs
seller should zap 1000ccs? right?
or
seller should zap 10000ccs, bot receive 7000ccs you pay 5000sats?
I define buyer the one selling CC for SATS, but yes it can be see in opposite way as well, and it can be confusing. How could we define it clearly?
edit: ok you added it
seller should zap 10000ccs, bot receive 7000ccs you pay 5000sats?
In this case @ek is willing to buy (zap) CCs so consequently is selling (pay/sell) sats.
So the buyer is willing to buy Sats so consequently is selling CCs.
Maybe it’s just me, but the 'commodity' here is CCs, so you’re buying/selling CCs in exchange for something else, which in this case is sats. So whoever sells CCs is the seller.
I think there could be some confusion if he hadn’t said “bot receives 10,000 credits.”
I think another confusion is about having the fees included or excluded.
I agree, this could cause some confusion. I think the fee should be included so it doesn’t create false expectations or make it feel like a scam.
you are not considering sybil fees. If 0.5 was the rate, buyer should zap 10000ccs, bot receive 700ccs you pay 500sats.
But your bot let the buyer pay the sybil fees on top of your exchange rate. That's why I consider it as buying offer with 0.35 exchange rate.
Seller is usually, but not always, the one paying the tx fees. Imagine you go to a shop and the merchant tells you there's a 3% extra charge if you pay with card.