pull down to refresh
Plus 30% fees? Can we call this scam?
It means the bot calculates for you how much you need to send for it to receive what it wants. It improves UX. What makes this a scam?
how have you defined your exchange rate?
I want two credits per sat. This means senders need to send 2/0.7=2.857 credits per sat because 30% will not arrive.
I have plans for a floating exchange rate.
Can you also explain why the transaction needs to be done as anon?
You don’t need to do it as anon, but why would you want to link your nym to a lightning invoice if you don’t have to?
What makes this a scam?
~186% above market price... Anything above 17% is usury = scam. You didn't study business in college right?
I have plans for a floating exchange rate.
That's what I thought, and why I asked how you do it.
You don’t need to do it as anon, but why would you want to link your nym to a lightning invoice if you don’t have to?
Why you don't just ask for a lightning address instead? or you really want to know which node the invoice is coming from?
lol, a lightning address returns lightning invoices
yes but your node see it and is better than publishing a lninvoice publicly.
I thought you were a smart guy that what you are revealing to be here, goint to contribute to Core and leaving SN for a good cause. Is you account being hack? Why wasting your time playing this bankster bs with cc?
Dude, you think a lightning address is more private than a lightning invoice? A lightning node does not care about lightning addresses. It can only pay lightning invoices. Anyone can fetch as many lightning invoices from your lightning address as they want. A lightning address is worse because you’re also revealing a nym and domain.
I thought you were smarter that what you are revealing to be here. Is you account being hack?
I could say the same to you
~186% above market price
It’s not 186%.
With the current exchange rate, I send 0.5 sats for every credit I receive. @0xbitcoiner sends 0.6 sats: #1559839
Therefore, you will receive 10% more if you use @0xbitcoiner‘s exchange rate.
Please explain 186%?
This wasn’t me. This exchange is not a scam. This @anon was @DarthCoin.
This exchange is not a scam.
Ok, g'luck on your new business.
This @anon was @DarthCoin.
How do you know?
If your issue is with the exchange rate, what do you think would be a fair exchange rate?
Your website is confusing because it doesn’t clarify whether the exchange rate is based on the amount sent or the amount received.
My exchange rate is the same as @SimpleStacker’s 0.5, assuming he meant 0.5 based on the amount he will receive.
How do you know?
He’s repetitive
what do you think would be a fair exchange rate?
I'm no one to define a fair exchange rate. I defined my, within the ~AGORA territory, with sybil fees included, to 0.91 sats/ccs #1323640 so buyer get 91sats each 100ccs
My exchange rate is the same as @SimpleStacker’s 0.5
Sure
Wow, exchange rate definitely out of market value!
Plus 30% fees? Can we call this scam?
Peer-to-peer transactions are much more affordable for both buyers and sellers. In this post I did some research and collected all the current offers for buying and selling cowboy credits with sats and vice versa. @ek, how have you defined your exchange rate? Can you also explain why the transaction needs to be done as anon?