pull down to refresh
CCs are just fine for SN. I really do not understand this madness of attaching external wallets.
If SN was only CCs, we could do it with a database. I don't think you would really even need Bitcoin to make such a system: everyone could just buy CCs with a creditcard or PayPal or something. Such a system is nowhere near as interesting as sending sats from my wallet to another stackers.
Do you really not see any value in attaching a wallet?
Do you really not see any value in attaching a wallet?
NONE. SN is just a game like WoW - you pay (with credits) to play.
Anybody that sees SN just as a source of assmilking sats to an external wallet is a scammer.
As I said many times but people do not pay attention to my words: SN is a marketing platform, not a faucet. If you can use it wisely it can be very useful, because is pay to post.
Remember that I always said: remove the rewards system from SN #796213
Bitcoin adoption is NOT driven by SN system...
Bitcoin adoption is NOT driven by SN system
I fully agree with you. But I think SN adoption is driven by Bitcoin, and trying to make the experience of using Bitcoin on SN less confusing is good.
I will accept that Spark may not be "making using Bitcoin in SN less confusing" -- but it is clear to me at least that the way we do Bitcoin on SN so far is very difficult for new people.
I fully agree with you.
Stacker News drove my bitcoin adoption, which is basically an existence proof to the contrary.
You are so full of bullshit.
If Bitcoin is not used as a MoE it will remain just a speculative commodity.
SNs is an ideal model to show how sats can be used as a MoE
You wank on about living on the bitcoin standard but you cant be fucked to actually help make it happen.
You are a big talk no walk HYPOCRITE.
That would be a bummer. If you use an attached lightning wallet, what does it matter what sort of wallet is embedded in SN?