I think the UX barrier is why machines-first matters, because interfaces are converging on a chat bot. The UX for Lightning and Stables can only be equivalent if its abstracted behind a slop cannon.
There was post last week about AI vs. Bitcoin, that notion misses the forest for the trees, the forest is AI is good for Bitcoin.
KYC as a friction/cost benefits illicit more than most, but not exclusively. The open-network vs. closed network is the most material thing beyond Bitcoin as the reserve currency, a given Stable has to become ubiquitous to compete on "money for the internet". The real cope is L402 for stables.
Stables are good for Bitcoin too. Stables aren't a savings vehicle, they reduce friction INTO the reserve currency.
I think the UX barrier is why machines-first matters, because interfaces are converging on a chat bot. The UX for Lightning and Stables can only be equivalent if its abstracted behind a slop cannon.
There was post last week about AI vs. Bitcoin, that notion misses the forest for the trees, the forest is AI is good for Bitcoin.
KYC as a friction/cost benefits illicit more than most, but not exclusively. The open-network vs. closed network is the most material thing beyond Bitcoin as the reserve currency, a given Stable has to become ubiquitous to compete on "money for the internet". The real cope is L402 for stables.
Stables are good for Bitcoin too. Stables aren't a savings vehicle, they reduce friction INTO the reserve currency.
Rule 1: Everything is good for Bitcoin.