pull down to refresh

The startup also claimed to have 8 million global users and to provide access to more than 400 models.

I wish them the best but I would be concern that OpenRouter is at the mercy of the different AI companies. (They don't control access and in theory could be cut out).

People with declined cards mostly reach for stables — that's the path of least resistance.

For sats it will start with privacy payments. Venice.ai will have a higher BTC payment rate than OpenRouter.

reply

I think that's why this deal makes sense for Stripe

At the end of the day, it's a marketplace. The moat is volume/distribution, providers need to go to them to increase distribution. But their margins are tight, if they add too much margin it creates room for a second player. Since the margin is tight down to the payment processing, vertical integration with a payments processor prevents anyone from under-cutting them. With stripe getting into stablecoins that even cuts out the payment networks, so there's no juice left for competitors to squeeze.

This is manifest of my thesis re: Lightning, but the intermediate stablecoin step.

Lightning/stablecoin payments must first track with granular, machine-to-machine payments, in competitive low-margin businesses: #1419562

The problem with stablecoins is the upper bound on the stablecoins respective network effects, potentially KYC gates, reserve value etc. A Lightning competitor could make inroads against OpenRouter eventually but this acquisition makes that more distant and a much higher bar to clear.

reply