The best would have been if Luke had resigned any time after stopping to perform the BIP Editor work. I had publicly asked for his resignation after him trying to assign a BIP number on Twitter for a BIP that hadn’t even been sent to the mailing list.
If we had removed Luke in the past few months, people like Giacomo would have said it’s retaliation for championing BIP110 or for calling us pedos all the same.
After not doing anything for years, all the crap he pulled, I don’t see how it would have been tenable to keep Luke on after he additionally announced his departure from Bitcoin development.
So, I’d be curious to hear what would have been a better time to remove Luke. What additional events would you have waited for, or which criteria would you have used?
The best would have been if Luke had resigned any time after stopping to perform the BIP Editor work. I had publicly asked for his resignation after him trying to assign a BIP number on Twitter for a BIP that hadn’t even been sent to the mailing list.
If we had removed Luke in the past few months, people like Giacomo would have said it’s retaliation for championing BIP110 or for calling us pedos all the same.
After not doing anything for years, all the crap he pulled, I don’t see how it would have been tenable to keep Luke on after he additionally announced his departure from Bitcoin development.
https://x.com/LukeDashjr/status/2086645671914840081
So, I’d be curious to hear what would have been a better time to remove Luke. What additional events would you have waited for, or which criteria would you have used?