pull down to refresh

139 sats \ 7 replies \ @petertodd 13 Aug \ on: Removing Luke Dashjr as a BIP editor is a sign of bitcoin centralization. bitcoin

A likely consequence of Luke getting kicked out will be the creation of a competitor to the central BIP repo. Having two repos rather than one is less centralized.

write
compose
1 sat \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 13 Aug
... will be the creation of a competitor to the central BIP repo.

Could you elaborate on that? I didn’t get it.

reply
107 sats \ 4 replies \ @petertodd 13 Aug

Luke's gonna start LBIPS: Luke's Bitcoin Improvement Proposals.

reply
91 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fenix 18 Aug

all Luke does is always resolves around him.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @adlai 17 Aug

there's a "why do we have a global CRDT notary network anyway" joke here, somewhere

too bad postingcommenting is so cheap that nobody will read the result.

reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner OP 13 Aug

But that’s gonna be on the forkcoin, it has nothing to do with Bitcoin anymore. right?

reply
543 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 13 Aug

I'm not going to bet on Luke leaving...

reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @gregtonoski 16 Aug

Community started their own repo of Bitcoin Improvement Proposals: https://github.com/GregTonoski/bips

reply