pull down to refresh
oh and btw, we intend to add all major merge-mining coins!
that's the answer i was expecting, let it flow, baby.
Bitcoin is a big tent. You have to make a living. I don't want you to think I'm just trying to heap maxi toxicity on you. I do have an aversion to altcoins, but regarding merged mining, I understand the economics, but I do think it sort of runs counter to your entire thesis that allowing the construction of blocks will help mining decentralization. It seems the main focus of your custom templates may serve to actually make it easier for big miners to further centralize with these additional altcoin fees. I know we probably come from very different perspectives. I'm open to listening. How do you see it as increasing decentralization?
80% of the bitcoin mining network merge-mines it now (i believe it's the top merge-mined coin) and the team behind RSK are highly technical and understood what Sv2 is... so it was only a natural fit!
all pools provide merge-mining. miners are used to it and expect it.
all pools provide merge-mining. miners are used to it and expect it.
Check out one of my projects, the Merge Mining Monitor, where I reveal the merge mining attribution of each Bitcoin block (and also track other data of interest, most importantly, stale blocks "embedded" in the history of merge-mined chains).
P.S. the data seems to indicate that Foundry are no longer merge-mining: https://mmm.deadmanoz.xyz/?view=findings&finding=foundry-exits-rsk-fractal-2026-06
yes, i love your project. spent hours looking at juicy stuff
almost certain that Braiins does merge-mining. p2pool... no one uses. If ocean doesn't, then their miners are earning less for their hashrate. shrug
Why rootstock?