Can't get the WF Securities publication this belongs to so it is hard to judge^[1].

Brookings did a similar comparison but with control groups instead of against US totals. They say largely the same re: jobs growth, but with the note that hyperscalers have larger economic impact than colos:

GT published their own thing^[2] and found that the benefits are reaped by metro areas, not rural:

For metro areas with strong labor markets and dense business ecosystems, data centers can deliver meaningful, though not transformative, economic gains. For rural communities, the positive impact is more complicated.

All in all, if I read between the lines of analyses by journos that probably do have access to all the gated stuff, then I'd guess that all this data is built specifically to argue a political/business goal and the truth is probably somewhere in the middle - it's all tradeoffs.

1. I suspect that it's gated through here ↩

2. And a gated paper ↩