pull down to refresh
It wasn't that the idea was utterly implausible but the technical theory was silly.
My recollection is that the thing they called a technology shock wasn't (it was just a residual) and the thing they called a recession wasn't (it was just a deviation from the long term growth trend).
reply
labeling the unexplained part and calling it a theory is a time tested academic tradition, like dark matter in physics
reply
I'm well aware. I work with people who devote a lot of time to studying and publishing about a particular residual, seemingly without realizing that's what they're doing.
reply
Mmmm... I obviously don't buy that recessions are caused by negative technology shocks, but it's reasonable to think that a technology shock can trigger a boom, and a recession follows from overinvestment