Right, it would likely need to be even deeper to affect nodes, but the reorg would need to be at least 288 blocks.

> Likely though this is mostly caused by my misunderstanding of his article.

I only skimmed the article, but I don’t think it made that point clearly before the recent amendment: https://stacker.news/items/1514882

Murch

I wonder how many users run pruned nodes at the absolute minimum. I checked the default suggested pruning size again

I believe floppy's article (and my summary of it) could have benefited from a clear statement that this requires a reorg of depth greater than pruning. Likely though this is mostly caused by my misunderstanding of his article.

bitcoin

bitdevs

Pruned node reorg UB in Core 31.0 / Knots 29.3 - how a BIP 110 split triggers it

Scoresby

I wonder how many users run pruned nodes at the absolute minimum. I checked the default suggested pruning size again

![](https://m.stacker.news/146238)

I believe floppy's article (and my summary of it) could have benefited from a clear statement that this requires a reorg of depth greater than pruning. Likely though this is mostly caused by my misunderstanding of his article.