Ah -- i missed that. A shame because the author had other interesting contrarian posts esrlier in week (e.g. #1511251).
Would this be an example of free speech not being "free?" i.e. someone needs to put up to have something published? Visibility needs capital (monetery, social or otherwise) etc.?
As a side note, I was one "casualty" of the downzapping doldrums back earlier this year, and so I can sympathize, it's not fun being subjected to that.
Ah -- i missed that. A shame because the author had other interesting contrarian posts esrlier in week (e.g. #1511251).
Would this be an example of free speech not being "free?" i.e. someone needs to put up to have something published? Visibility needs capital (monetery, social or otherwise) etc.?
As a side note, I was one "casualty" of the downzapping doldrums back earlier this year, and so I can sympathize, it's not fun being subjected to that.