I have 43 after my not-pushed msats/sats and description truncation work. Of the 43, 3 are high and about key rotation, 9 medium (some out of scope), and a long tail of low.

> > Let's see how much of my preliminary list gets solved

According to bot analysis of last night's patch:

* 4 concerns partially addressed
* 4 concerns fully resolved
* 36 unresolved, of which 4 widened
* (4 resolved in the last run)

I don't like the recurrence of a `4` count, so it's probably bullshitting.

***

PS: Claude Code seems to auto trigger dynamic workflows when I omit subtask decomposition specs for large requests.

Stats are fun:

```console
  42% of your usage came from subagent-heavy sessions
   Each subagent runs its own requests. Be deliberate about spawning them — and
   consider configuring a cheaper model for simpler subagents.

  36% of your usage came from subagents under "forgejo"
   If this runs frequently, consider configuring its subagents with a cheaper
   model or tightening their prompts.

  61% of your usage came from /forgejo
   Heavy skills can be scoped down or run with a cheaper model via skill
   frontmatter.

  Skills                  % of usage
  /forgejo                       61%

  Subagents               % of usage
  forgejo                        36%
```

*No, Anthropic, I am not going to use Sonnet. I know you wanna save me credz but I actually read all that, `#noyolo`*

optimism

Interesting. I've multi-job'd the same diff all within 200k (opus high - the only difference between high and xhigh is the context window, iirc)

It's good that it is not offloading to Sonnet though.

It chose the context window by itself. I think that's the default of workflows: xhigh with 1M. I haven't tried to change the workflow params yet and I'm not sure if it'll listen.