> Analysis is fine, false positive rate is under 20% for me now, maybe even under 10%.

I think the difference between analysis and codegen is that analysis is like going from point A to point B via as many routes as possible. Codegen requires picking one of few great routes.

k00b

It sounds like you're having more luck than me recently.

I'm still happy with my Dec-Feb investment in bespoke orchestration. I'm semi-happy with Claude, relatively unhappy with GPT - I use it less and less - and neutral with GLM. I'm 99% skeptical about codegen still. Analysis is fine, false positive rate is under 20% for me now, maybe even under 10%.

I do get tired of reading all the slop, but in some of my usecases ("analyze this 600k line diff for x,y,z") the choice I have is to either be going over well structured opti-instructed slop, or generally poor slop code from a third party. I prefer "my slop" over "their slop"; it's simply better slop, lol.

Stacker Saloon

saloon

> It sounds like you're having more luck than me recently.

I'm still happy with my Dec-Feb investment in bespoke orchestration. I'm semi-happy with Claude, relatively unhappy with GPT - I use it less and less - and neutral with GLM. I'm 99% skeptical about codegen still. Analysis is fine, false positive rate is under 20% for me now, maybe even under 10%.

I do get tired of reading all the slop, but in some of my usecases ("analyze this 600k line diff for x,y,z") the choice I have is to either be going over well structured opti-instructed slop, or generally poor slop code from a third party. I prefer "my slop" over "their slop"; it's simply better slop, lol.