pull down to refresh
def could be too econ-y, too heavy on the formal modeling for them
reply
That's possible, yeah. Another possibility is that it wasn't really about bitcoin per se. I was a more traditional econ paper about incentives, bitcoin is just part of the setting.
reply
They didn't give a reason, and I don't think they've published the accepted papers list.
The call for papers said interdisciplinary, with econ being one of the listed fields. Interestingly, the Bitcoin Research Institute at University of Wyoming is housed in the philosophy department